Funny, I feel like this sort of describes me. I used to believe in goodness and fairness, but now I believe in freedom and the oath I swore to defend the constitution has more meaning in the US than it did when I was in the service and elsewhere.
I don't understand why freedom has to be a selfish thing, a rejection of the possibility of human good.
It is my very respect for the innate value of each individual which caused me to adopt a liberal way of thought, and it is precisely my liberalism which has lead me to reject gun control, as well as most other forms of state control.
If you look at the dictionary, you'll discover that there is absolutely nothing liberal about gun control, as a matter of basic definitional fact. That there are (maybe even a great many) people who call themselves "liberals" and who also, illiberally, support gun control, but then there are "conservatives" who do the same.
While it is very true that many folks have a naive sense of compassion which they lose with maturity, and this leads to much less support of "leftist" causes, and thus leads to a tendency of becoming more "conservative" with age, this says absolutely
nothing about the intellectual progression of a truly liberal human being.
Thomas Jefferson was a liberal until the day he died, and I sure am not willing to claim greater insight or intelligence than he possessed.
I myself had no passion for freedom until I became an adult. I equate my passion for freedom with liberalism (the dictionary and historical fact support this), and therefore maintain that both my passion for freedom and my liberalism grow with every passing day.
In addition to misquoting Churchill (he never said that), I find that statement thoroughly insulting. I am as pro-liberty as any man on this forum, and I challenge folks to find fault with either my liberalism or my advocation of liberty.