• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

The New Breed of LEO's

Elkad

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2008
Messages
115
Location
Bluefield, West Virginia, USA
And if it is a Ford with the keypad on the door, locking the keys inside is useless anyway. You can defeat any Ford keypad in 10 minutes or less.

Ford added a lockout timer on the recent models (starting in 09?). 1 min delay every 35 bad keypresses - adding 100 minutes to the maximum attack time.
 

SouthernBoy

Regular Member
Joined
May 12, 2007
Messages
5,837
Location
Western Prince William County, Virginia, USA
Sheriff and skidmark;


The onus is on me. I jumped the gun and was thinking not of an arrest but if the officer asked you to step out of your vehicle. In such a case, it is wise to make sure your windows are closed and then lock the car when you close the door.

Sorry for the misunderstanding, gentlemen.
 

Roverhound

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2012
Messages
84
Location
Stuarts Draft, Virginia
The roadside test is designed to be failed. The officer can keep making request until you are failed on his judgement.
Be very careful on requesting a breathalyzer, they are notorious for false readings. Do a little research and you'll see.
 

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,452
Location
White Oak Plantation
<some snipping here and there>

out of all the cops out there, how many violated someone's civil rights?
Just today? Or ever, even just once.....maybe? Far more than they (cops) would likely care to admit, me thinks.

It's just that they will/would/did violate a citizen's rights just a teeny tiny bit, all done in the name of justice and 'preserving the peace'. I will opine that the vast majority of 'peace officers' fall into the just a teeny tiny bit category, just 'enough rights violating' to still be able to sleep at night.....but not one step further towards the 'dark side'.....obviously. Just as there are a untold number of 'good encounters' there are likely just as many untold 'not so good' encounters. But, getting to go on about our business after a "consensual contact" is considered a win for OC.....isn't it?

It sucks when you are the one whose rights are violated, when you are the one getting rousted and hassled.
Ya think! But, if your rights are violated just a teeny tiny bit for the greater good, mind you, is that OK? I will take the liberty to remind folks that making a big deal out the teeny tiniest of rights violations may lead any given cop and every one of his cop buddies to think badly of the OC community, because we made a stink over a teeny tiny thing.

But what happens to you is not indicative of what all cops do.

stay safe.
Do all cops have the well-being of our rights foremost in their minds? I submit that somewhere after their personal safety, first and foremost, and then sometime after many other things relating to their job security, our rights may finally be encountered on their mental check list during a contact.

When a cop preemptively acts on the behalf of the 'psychological well-being' of a yet to be manifested slight to the 'unarmed citizenry's sensibilities', over the enumerated rights of the lawful OCer. No matter how teeny tiny the enumerated right may be, that cop is not a 'good' cop.
 

NovaCop

New member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
471
Location
, ,
As usual

New breed of cop? Give me a break. So you first assert there is some new breed of crappy cops out there by generalizing all new officers and calling them clones. Then it's indicated all the cops are dumb and can't make decision. Further it's said that small cops are scared and would violate rights out of fear? This is too entertaining not to read ha.

Dumb cops? In the past decade most agencies require (or only hire) candidates with college degrees. Departments now require a ton of legal and tactical training. This doesn't mean all cops are smart, but generalizing them all as dumb is inaccurate and without basis.

So small cops or nerdy cops will violate rights because they are afraid of large or gun toting people? Come on now, so all cops can only be muscleheads? How about tax payer money going for a large weightroom and paying officers to lift? Guess no female cops should ever be allowed on the street since their not as strong and surely will violate rights out of fear? manny pacquiao is a small guy, guess he can't be a cop. Hey smart guy, you should be a cop just for a year. You will see how many people want to fight and or resist your lawful arrests. Cops go hands on routinely. I can't tell you how many people I've had to fight in this job, most high on drugs or drunk. Pcp is coming back. So your assumption cops aren't use to confrontations is ridiculous.

There are good cops and bad cops as there are good doctors and bad doctors. Since cops are human there will always be some bad apples or bad decisions made. I think the major issues is training with departments. They may not take enough time to teach their officers on gun laws and current trends. I know many departments have recently added more training on this so maybe the new breed will actually be better. Generalizing them all only makes you look very ignorant.
 

peter nap

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
13,551
Location
Valhalla
But ...But....

Sheriff is one of your brothers and he's the one that posted that. He has 3 decades of law enforcement you know.
Don't tel me you all are starting to eat your own:rolleyes:
 

scouser

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2011
Messages
1,341
Location
804, VA
But ...But....

Sheriff is one of your brothers and he's the one that posted that. He has 3 decades of law enforcement you know.
Don't tel me you all are starting to eat your own:rolleyes:

lmao peter ... you know that 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend' ??




... waits for peter's head to implode ...................
 

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,452
Location
White Oak Plantation
Doctors, good and bad, do not have qualified immunity when they do bad. Doctors do not normally have the other doctors in their practice review their badness and then declare that the doctor was not operating outside the bounds of office policy.....

Poor training.....this is about the mindset and not the mind. When/if your boss don't like X you tend to not like X to keep your job. When/if your buddies don't like X you tend to not like X to have a easy life at work. So, who is at fault? Your boss, your buddies, or you?.

This OC thing has been around many moons now, yet cops still roust citizens. The clock ran out on "Dang.....I didn't know OC was legal.....I'm sorry I and several of my coworkers rousted you for you doing what is apparently perfectly legal.....nobody ever told me or them.....sorry. I/we were not trained properly....obviously. Here's your gun back, can I buy you a cup of coffee?"

How difficult is it to state in cop school: "OC is legal/not illegal in this state."
How difficult is it to state on day one of work: "OC is legal/not illegal in this state, county, city/town/village."
How difficult is it to remember that OC is legal when told even once that OC is legal.
 

Gunslinger

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
3,853
Location
Free, Colorado, USA
As a current Virginia resident he was drawing from his experiences to make the point that officers can be polite and effective or not wherever they are found. The officer's conduct was the point, not the e-check system. Excepting for the palm trees, that could have been the City of Richmond. I enjoyed them and was able to relate to happenings here.

Excepting for the palm trees and the trampling of constitutional rights, you mean. Nice cop, very professional at violating the 2nd Amendment he purported to support. Don't blame him, as the PDR of Kalifornia mandates the treatment of its subjects, not generally the cop on the beat.
 

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,452
Location
White Oak Plantation
Oh yes they do! I have sat through my fair share of medical malpractice lawsuits in my day, and they all back each other up just like cops do.
The key element of your post is the medical malpractice lawsuits....this translated into English means that it made it to a courtroom. Cops do not normally have to worry about a courtroom.
 

skidmark

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
10,444
Location
Valhalla
....
How difficult is it to remember that OC is legal when told even once that OC is legal.

How many times do cops start interactions with folks because they are OCing? I was under the impression that cops started contacts with folks because there was a MWAG call that never got around to finding out what the MWAG was doing with the G at the moment. All they know is the called is "scared" or "worried". So cops need to go out and see what's up.

I was under the impression that cops started contacts with folks because someone [falsely] reported a MWAG was pointing the G or "flaunting" it on his hip or "threatening" or "intimidating" someone with the/by the prersence of the G. So cops need to go out and see what's up.

And yes, there are cops who have received no call from dispatch about a MWAG or a MWAH* or a MWP** but will stop the first person they see with a G or a H or S in hopes of finding something. The issue is - how often does that happen and how may cops are out there doing it?

But seriously, where are all these incidents that happen "just because someone was OCing"?

I agree that the response from supervisors/agency heads needs to be better. But there is also a part of me that wants the documentation that in spite of complaints there was no investigation, or no "refresher" training, or no "FYI so I stop getting all these complaints" notice - gross negligence and indifference gets translated into punative damages.

stay safe.


*MHAH = Man With A Hat
** MWS = Man Wearing Shorts
 

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,452
Location
White Oak Plantation
Do you think that with so few OCers, given any local population, that 'all' the regular/normal/habitual OCers are pretty much known to the local constabulary? Are you still stopped from time to time? Are you not stopped at all any more?

Now, how many times do they do nothing when they see the OCer? Unless of course they close their eyes before they initiate contact so as to have a plausible excuse for making contact to begin with. "I didn't actually 'see' the POI* so I was forced to make contact."

Sadly, cops just don't normally get trained to just drive by if they don't actually 'see' anything.....did I say 'see' anything.....like with their own eyes.....like in progress? No, they just have to stop and have a little chat, they just can't help themselves.

Now, I don't know how the cops in the Commonwealth view a 'reported felony' and what cops are allowed to do when they get a report of a MWAG walking around pointing at citizens, but here in Missouri I don't have to 'Show Them' they are gunna pretty much cuff/stuff sans the chatting part. No mister nice cop so to speak.

Now, what are the stats on MWAG calls per day, per week per month, per year, would be some very interesting info.

I smell what you're cooking, I don't necessarily think that what you're cooking is good for everybody.....add a little more salt and pepper, maybe some cumin, to spice it up, and more folks may like what you're cooking.

*POI = Person Of Interest

Anyway, just cuz cops ain't being reported as having been doing some violating even a teeny tiny little bit does not mean that most cops are lily white, nor are they habitually stupid at the most inconvenient time for the citizen. I can't prove one way or the other and neither can you.
 

WalkingWolf

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2011
Messages
11,930
Location
North Carolina
They do when they deal with me.

I have no reservations whatsoever about suing them over wrongful actions.

I have no problem reporting them and testifying against them, as a former LE nothing makes me more mad is a bad cop. Whether they are bad because they are crooked, or because they are inept, the LAC should not be made to suffer bad cops.
 

skidmark

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
10,444
Location
Valhalla
Do you think that with so few OCers, given any local population, that 'all' the regular/normal/habitual OCers are pretty much known to the local constabulary? Are you still stopped from time to time? Are you not stopped at all any more?....

I presume you have seen pictures of me. There is NO way I'm going to be confused with law enforcment - unless you have a Sgt. Santa program. I OC 99%+ of the time.

I lunch at sports that the cops (uniformed and plain clothes) frequent. I hit the two gun stores where they spend most of their time and money. I am in and out of the County Government Center. I spend a small amount of time out and about late at night in a "bad" area. The cops and I meet and greet each other (as in nod, say "Hello") at several of the convenience stores in the area, and I am pretty sure they see me OCing. None of them seem to know me by name, and I've confused some with a recent change of daily ride. I have never been stopped. (OK, I have picked up two speeding tickets in ~8 years and there was that "incident" down at the ferry - but I don't thiink that counts as being "stopped".)

We (a small group of regulars) meet for breakfast every Saturday. We usually eat at the same place, and we know that the cops have on occassion driven by for various reasons, but I can only think of one time when they took any interest in the fact that we were OCing - and that was because they nearly ran over us hurrying to get in and then get out when looking for someone who was behind in child support. Nobody was asked for "papers" or questioned/harassed about OCing. We have ha local cops and State Police come in to eat when we were there - and a few times while our tobacco-dependant contingent was hanging around the front door sucking down the nicotine so they could come back in and drink more coffee. Not a word was exchanged anout anybody OCing. A larger group gets together once a month for dinner, and we do tend to rotate between several "regular" places. Never has a customer "paniced" and called to report a MWAG (Mob with a gun in this case). We have had cops who patrol the parking lot slow down as they drove past us while we were hanging out on the sidewalk before or after dinner. No stops, not harassment.

It's not just "us" and our little area of operations because there are several other regular gatherings of OCers around the state. Except for the infamous Tony's Pizza incident I cannot recall anybody anywhere getting rousted/harassed. Because it is north of Ashland I do not try to keep up with what the folks in Manassas are doing but there seems to be a serious lack of reporting of any problems since that event got attended to.

There must be something to that "Sic Sempeer Tyrannis" motto.:uhoh:

stay safe.
 

Sig229

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
926
Location
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
In my few negative experiences with LEOs while OCing it has been what I would consider older generation LEOs that were the ones pushing the envelope on my rights the most.

I have to agree.

The older LEO's seem to have their ego's built up so big that the Napoleon Complex would be the understatement of the year.

I have had lengthy conversations with younger LEO's and we both left feeling positive about the encounter.
However, the older cops have pulled me out of my vehicle, searched my car and yelled directly in my face when I exclaimed that never gave consent. And all of that was for being white and driving through a black neighborhood.
 
Top