• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Vermont city may use loophole to push gun control in 2014

cirrusly

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
291
Location
North Dakota

KennyB

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2010
Messages
87
Location
Mountain Top
What a surprise........Burlington. And City Councilman Norm Blais uses Newtown for his reasoning for "gun control". Just like every other anti-constitutional politician. Perhaps Norm should read the Vermont AND federal Constitutions......;)
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,337
Location
Valhalla
See no "loophole" - see a delberate misread.

VT. STAT. ANN. tit. 24 § 2295 (2011)
§ 2295. Authority of municipal and county governments to regulate firearms, ammunition, hunting, fishing and trapping

Except as otherwise provided by law, no town, city or incorporated village, by ordinance, resolution or other enactment, shall directly regulate hunting, fishing and trapping or the possession, ownership, transportation, transfer, sale, purchase, carrying, licensing or registration of traps, firearms, ammunition or components of firearms or ammunition. This section shall not limit the powers conferred upon a town, city or incorporated village under section 2291(8) of this title. The provisions of this section shall supersede any inconsistent provisions of a municipal charter.

IMO that translates to mean "Except as otherwise provided by state law, no town, city or incorporated village,........."
 
Last edited:

Eeyore

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2007
Messages
547
Location
on the move
Eats shoots and leaves

I read the story three times because I couldn't understand how the loophole "proceeded" from the law. Then I realized there was no "from" and they meant to say preceded. (The error was in the original Fox story).

Still, the councilman is an idiot who's deluding himself into thinking he can get around the law.

When I was growing up there, Vermont was such a nice place, and tended to be very conservative. Now it's a lot more liberal, and a lot less nice. Coincidence?
 
Last edited:

vermonter

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Messages
341
Location
, ,
Eeyore is right on the money!

Eeyore Wrote: "When I was growing up there, Vermont was such a nice place, and tended to be very conservative. Now it's a lot more liberal, and a lot less nice. Coincidence"?

YES, but NOT in a bible thumping, controlling, hating of "this and that group" kind of way like you find in other states. It was an old Vermont Yankee INDEPENDENT thinking type of conservatism (think Barry Goldwater, not Palin). You go to certain southern so called "conservative" states and the police control everything along with a city manager. In Florida for example they take 7 year olds to jail for fighting on the playground! In Tennessee don't dare carry cash when travelling! In old Vermont REAL Vermonters go to town meeting to decide all issues, not just ones that effect them, like Ex Massholes coming to meeting to fight Jon Fishman (Phish) who wanted to put up a wind tower on his PRIVATE property. You are right Eeyore - it was a nice place when old school "live and let live" Vermont Conservatives were in control. The current bunch of liberals from NY, NJ and Mass actually took out ads in the South Bronx to advertise that social programs were the best in the nation and they came in DROVES to get handouts, sell drugs, and rob locals. Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire and Montana are the ONLY free states in my book - free from the liberals AND bible thumpers who also want to make you tow the line. Don't judge the rest of Vermont based on Burl, Rutland, Brat and Mont-P.
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,337
Location
Valhalla
More news

[h=1]Burlington voters opt to give up gun rights, gut state preemption.[/h] March 5, 2014

Three City of Burlington resolutions were passed by voters Tuesday, Vermont’s WPTZ News Channel 5 reported this morning. The measures are now headed to the state legislature, where it will be decided if municipalities will be given the power to override state preemption protections.


Voters chose to allow authorities to seize firearms at domestic investigations (Yes: 5,579 / No: 2,066), ban firearms from establishments that serve liquor (Yes: 5,194 / No: 2,517), and require firearms in the home to be locked up (Yes: 4,351 / No: 2,971) in an election that marks the latest battle in a long campaign being waged between “progressive” Burlington Council members working with Gun Sense Vermont, and the Vermont Federation of Sportmen’s Clubs.
http://www.examiner.com/article/burlington-voters-opt-to-give-up-gun-rights-gut-state-preemption?CID=examiner_alerts_article
 

cirrusly

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
291
Location
North Dakota
Hoping the state legislators will uphold the Vermont "Sportsman Constitution" which these regulations would directly violate.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Top