stainless1911
Banned
So, most human pregnancies are intentional?
Or, those who have money, are the only ones that should be having sex?
Or, those who have money, are the only ones that should be having sex?
Last edited:
So, most human pregnancies are intentional?
Or, those who have money, are the only ones that should be having sex?
Yeah, or that....Or fight someone on Jerry Springer.
But the baby doesn't have a choice. It's murder.
All this video proves is that politicians have been ranting on the same stuff for 50 years....
All this thread proves is that when Eye95 takes his ball and goes home by saying "moving on", he actually means, "I'll be posting again in less than 1 page." For Pete's sake... MOVE ON then... you look like a bratty baby when you post "moving on" in every other post where someone doesn't agree with you... then you're back for more in 3 posts.
As I have repeatedly explained, when I "move on," I am absenting myself from a particular subdiscussion with a particular poster. He can have the last word on the particular back-and-forth in which we are fruitlessly enmeshed. I will respond on the topic to the thread with other poster as that may yet be fruitful. I will also reengage the poster if he is discussing something different.
I see your comment as a how-dare-you-deem-what-someone-is-saying-as-not-worthy-of-your-time. To which I will reply "meh" and "moving on" as what you say in this post is not worthy of me wasting even one more second of my time.
Moving on.
Because we are humans too, despite our financial status. We have the right to reproduce, our feelings and lives are the same. Most pregnancys arent planned, and murder is wrong at any age.
I'm not saying that I agree with welfare. What I'm saying is that there are people in circumstances legitimately outside their control with a legitimate need for these services. They are not all lazy, low-life deadbeats as keeps getting toted around here.
I'm not saying that I agree with welfare. What I'm saying is that there are people in circumstances legitimately outside their control with a legitimate need for these services. They are not all lazy, low-life deadbeats as keeps getting toted around here.
While there are indeed people that are in need of these services, there is no provision in the Constitution for charity, be it to a citizen, company, or country. NONE!!
I mentioned charity would make a bigger come back for those who truly needed help. And was told Charity was degrading. I guess armed robbery is a more civilized way of taking care of those in need.
There are enough jobs for anyone who actually wants one and is not just paying lip service to "looking for a job."
I absolutely agree that we all have a right to reproduce. We do NOT have a right to steal from others to raise those children, either directly, or indirectly using the government as an agent. When someone goes on welfare or food stamps they are benefiting from theft.
You can't blame the recipients, it's there and they take it, human nature. The blame lies on the professional politicians who use the programs to buy votes.
I think that was a reason why the founders had a limit on who could vote. You had to have property some skin in the game.
It's not that I want to take away peoples votes but it is absolutely wrong for politicians to use the fact that some don't have (and encourage more not to have) at the expense of those who do.
You can't blame the recipients, it's there and they take it, human nature. The blame lies on the professional politicians who use the programs to buy votes.