Time Travel Proven

[stainless1911]

So, most human pregnancies are intentional?

Or, those who have money, are the only ones that should be having sex?

 

[Brass Magnet]

So, most human pregnancies are intentional?

Or, those who have money, are the only ones that should be having sex?

Neither. Simply that you must be prepared to face the consequences of your action.

 

[stainless1911]

Or fight someone on Jerry Springer.

 

[Brass Magnet]

Or fight someone on Jerry Springer.

Yeah, or that....
LOL :lol::lol:

 

[HKcarrier]

All this video proves is that politicians have been ranting on the same stuff for 50 years....


All this thread proves is that when Eye95 takes his ball and goes home by saying "moving on", he actually means, "I'll be posting again in less than 1 page." For Pete's sake... MOVE ON then... you look like a bratty baby when you post "moving on" in every other post where someone doesn't agree with you... then you're back for more in 3 posts.

 

[stainless1911]

lol

 

[georg jetson]

But the baby doesn't have a choice. It's murder.

Finish the thought process... the baby chose to be conceived in the first place??

 

[eye95]

All this video proves is that politicians have been ranting on the same stuff for 50 years....


All this thread proves is that when Eye95 takes his ball and goes home by saying "moving on", he actually means, "I'll be posting again in less than 1 page." For Pete's sake... MOVE ON then... you look like a bratty baby when you post "moving on" in every other post where someone doesn't agree with you... then you're back for more in 3 posts.

As I have repeatedly explained, when I "move on," I am absenting myself from a particular subdiscussion with a particular poster. He can have the last word on the particular back-and-forth in which we are fruitlessly enmeshed. I will respond on the topic to the thread with other poster as that may yet be fruitful. I will also reengage the poster if he is discussing something different.

I see your comment as a how-dare-you-deem-what-someone-is-saying-as-not-worthy-of-your-time. To which I will reply "meh" and "moving on" as what you say in this post is not worthy of me wasting even one more second of my time.

 

[marshaul]

As I have repeatedly explained, when I "move on," I am absenting myself from a particular subdiscussion with a particular poster. He can have the last word on the particular back-and-forth in which we are fruitlessly enmeshed. I will respond on the topic to the thread with other poster as that may yet be fruitful. I will also reengage the poster if he is discussing something different.

I see your comment as a how-dare-you-deem-what-someone-is-saying-as-not-worthy-of-your-time. To which I will reply "meh" and "moving on" as what you say in this post is not worthy of me wasting even one more second of my time.

Moving on.

 

[PracticalTactical]

Moving on.

That was pretty funny.

 

[END_THE_FED]

Because we are humans too, despite our financial status. We have the right to reproduce, our feelings and lives are the same. Most pregnancys arent planned, and murder is wrong at any age.

I absolutely agree that we all have a right to reproduce. We do NOT have a right to steal from others to raise those children, either directly, or indirectly using the government as an agent. When someone goes on welfare or food stamps they are benefiting from theft.

Most pregnancies, even if they are not "planned" are NOT accidents. If one makes a choice to have sex without using birth control then they can not claim that the pregnancy is an accident. It would be like one playing Russian roulette and then claiming they "accidentally" shot themselves.

I am not sure why you mentioned murder. Nowhere in my post did I advocate murder, or anything that could be construed as murder. I think you may have mis-read my post.

 

[Jack House]

I'm not saying that I agree with welfare. What I'm saying is that there are people in circumstances legitimately outside their control with a legitimate need for these services. They are not all lazy, low-life deadbeats as keeps getting toted around here.

 

[rodbender]

I'm not saying that I agree with welfare. What I'm saying is that there are people in circumstances legitimately outside their control with a legitimate need for these services. They are not all lazy, low-life deadbeats as keeps getting toted around here.

While there are indeed people that are in need of these services, there is no provision in the Constitution for charity, be it to a citizen, company, or country. NONE!!

 

[sudden valley gunner]

I'm not saying that I agree with welfare. What I'm saying is that there are people in circumstances legitimately outside their control with a legitimate need for these services. They are not all lazy, low-life deadbeats as keeps getting toted around here.

While there are indeed people that are in need of these services, there is no provision in the Constitution for charity, be it to a citizen, company, or country. NONE!!

I mentioned charity would make a bigger come back for those who truly needed help. And was told Charity was degrading. I guess armed robbery is a more civilized way of taking care of those in need.

 

[Gunslinger]

I mentioned charity would make a bigger come back for those who truly needed help. And was told Charity was degrading. I guess armed robbery is a more civilized way of taking care of those in need.

Well, there is less paperwork...

 

[Gunslinger]

There are enough jobs for anyone who actually wants one and is not just paying lip service to "looking for a job."

I think that's true, but "under employed" is the new reality. Unemployment numbers double--or more, when you add "gave up looking." If you add under employed, I've heard as high as 30% and I believe it. But there are jobs, cleaning crews, part-time at 7-11, night watchmen, etc for those who feel they have responsibility to their families and themselves, not the government dole. Many military familes get foodstamps. That's what bothers me the most.

I saw a video about some pos Black woman--every other word was 'F.' She said when she wasn't working--meaning we were paying for her, it was paradise. Now that she has some job, it's bondage...just like slavery, the magic word for Blacks who think we owe them for what happened 150 years ago. What an *******, and how typical of her breed, and certainly not all Black, that relish handouts and sitting on their useless asses while we support them with their messiah in office. This bitch's welfare ran out, so now she's a slave and it's our, taxpaying, fault.

 

[PracticalTactical]

I absolutely agree that we all have a right to reproduce. We do NOT have a right to steal from others to raise those children, either directly, or indirectly using the government as an agent. When someone goes on welfare or food stamps they are benefiting from theft.

You can't blame the recipients, it's there and they take it, human nature. The blame lies on the professional politicians who use the programs to buy votes.

 

[sudden valley gunner]

You can't blame the recipients, it's there and they take it, human nature. The blame lies on the professional politicians who use the programs to buy votes.

I think that was a reason why the founders had a limit on who could vote. You had to have property some skin in the game.

It's not that I want to take away peoples votes but it is absolutely wrong for politicians to use the fact that some don't have (and encourage more not to have) at the expense of those who do.

 

[PracticalTactical]

I think that was a reason why the founders had a limit on who could vote. You had to have property some skin in the game.

It's not that I want to take away peoples votes but it is absolutely wrong for politicians to use the fact that some don't have (and encourage more not to have) at the expense of those who do.

Sounds like a pretty good argument against "progressive" taxation.

 

[marshaul]

You can't blame the recipients, it's there and they take it, human nature. The blame lies on the professional politicians who use the programs to buy votes.

+1