+1
You broke the conditioning, the vast majority can't or won't, hence our national situation. The unforgivable sin is "not being nice" , even if the victim was a POS. I don't know the record of this Va pol, but let's say Obama was assassinated. I'm capable of more than binary thinking. On the one hand, I could feel sorry for his family, I could feel sorry that he chose to join the predator class, I could feel sorry that he chose to be a war criminal, and a traitor. And on the other hand I could take satisfaction knowing that he got what was coming to him. I could hope that it would send a message to his successors that there are some people left who aren't playing games, and are serious about defending this nation against domestic enemies. I'm sure Obama's death would only accelerate the tyranny, but you get my point.
Agree with 77zach and Citizen in that respect; it is (currently) beyond my ability to pray for the recovery of an enemy of Freedom, though I must say Death may be an even worse alternative. Nobody chooses to be a victim, and I would hope nobody would wish for a son to attempt what the deceased did, but we don't choose to give away our Freedoms as "representatives" would make it appear. As to why Citizen was attacked for not being nice, I think it also had a bit to do with the tasteless remarks and speculation that came early in the life of this thread from one particular individual (who I felt ambivalent towards up til those remarks), which I believe set off the powder keg of breach of "conditioning".
Anyways, these are my reasons (and mine alone, as far as I know) for not being able to pray for an enemy of Freedom:
1) If such an enemy recovers, he may well return to his old ways, bolstered now with the sympathies of otherwise open-eyed individuals still uninvolved. (Case in point: Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, who now uses the "I was shot, so that makes me an expert on gun violence" card that the Brady bunch uses so often)
In this case, the best I can do is say "may your will be done," but without asking for their health to go either way.
2) If such an enemy is claimed by Death, his Death will lead to his portrayal as a saint, a martyr for his work to "put an end" to _______ ("social problem"). At that point, you get the "how many more good people have to suffer/die" speech to elicit an emotional response that clouds the minds of rational-minded individuals.
In this case, I just say "please protect the Innocent who are rendered defenseless [I always stress the importance of children, as they are not yet old enough to protect themselves]." The parents who choose to become easy targets are, like in case #1, left entirely to His will; I will neither pray for their death nor their recovery.
3) If the person recovers
partially, the enemies of Freedom get the best of both worlds: they have a living martyr to champion their (emotion-driven and unjust) cause, and they have an "expert" on whatever "societal problem" they chose.
So unless the enemy of Freedom sees the Light (pun intended), it is a lose-lose-BIG LOSE situation in regards to Freedom. I can sum up my feelings on the issue with a quote from a play (coincidentally, the name of that Shakespearean play is also the name of the individual of the tasteless remarks and speculation).
"To show an unfelt sorrow is an office
Which the false man does easy."
- Malcom, Act II, Scene ii (guess the Shakespearean play)
That said, I feel sorry for the loss experienced by the mother (a child's death is always a great loss for ANY real mother), the senator and the rest of the family (same reason), and of course the first responders that had to witness the scene.
@HPmatt: that phrase should follow "Molon Labe" on every sticker, flag, and sign (and tattoos, for the hardcore).