Primus
Regular Member
The creation of these dumb laws is entirely the fault of the antis. You can't blame someone standing up for their Rights as the reason those Rights are being curtailed by an ever-increasing government bureaucracy.
If anything, another Revolution would be better in the long run: without any single example of a free republic on this Earth, people may forget what Freedom and Liberty once meant.
On a related note: the antis might not know how to use guns right now, but they've shown an incredible talent for being submissive to groupthink opinions, and carrying out "orders" unquestioningly.
One last bit: if I am able to quote you in one year, two years, or five years, I would be glad the infrastructure for doing so remained in place (maybe).
Add.:
Not advocating violence, far from it. As a matter of fact, I wish I could go my entire life without ever having to defend myself from someone wishing to do harm to my loved ones or I. I would love to be known as "crazy gun owner who thought the government wouldn't go back to protecting the people's Rights and Freedoms". But there is one saying that I believe applies to all gun owners who remember the primary reason for owning guns in the first place:
"I train, in earnest, to do what I hope, in earnest, I never have to do."
Here's the problem. Your equating this issue to the Revolution.
This is more akin to the civil war. This is half the population calls for gun legislation and half doesn't. Its all internal of the country.
You would figure that after the civil war people would be wary to ever engage in conflict that again, but it seems some are all too willing to do it again, but this time with the spin of its for the constitution.
I still doubt it will go that route, but again there are those who are begging for it to happen.
Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk