No cripple is not a filtered word - I singled out the usage. There is no reason to alienate or insult a segment of our population with ill chosen words. We are still a publicly read forum are we not? That you did not get that message is unfortunate - that you chose to make it a point of contention is more so.
You may be a fan of the First Amend. (I am too) but that is hardly the point. We work hard at maintaining a positive image here and that means applying the rules and making judgement calls. The least effective argument on private property is but I have rights........no, we have privileges.
I do get that message, I truly do. That's why I decided to clarify that there is no derogatory intent. I have several relatives that have Cripple-Carts, and they refer to it that way. Hell, where do you think I learned the term? I thought it was hilarious, because they were 'taking it back' (filter test: "Porch Monkey"). Words are only derogatory with intent. I'll admit that my original use was not as clear as it could have been, so I guess without knowing my intent, your moderation is justified, albeit a bit over-the-top PC.
I do get it. Our words here can so easily be taken out of context and spammed all over CNN.
If I had said: "While I was unloading MY cripple-cart......", that would have been OK, right?
OK, OK, truce. You got my non-PC panties in a bunch. I just can't ******* stand being ***-****** ******-******* censored.
I do want to point out... our rights do not end on private property. They just get preempted by trespass laws. At no point do our rights become privileges just because we set foot on private property. It's just a question of whether those rights are recognized by the property owner, or denied-via-trespass. (TBG taught me this, just recently)
The parallel between private (physical) property and private (website) property was not lost on me. I see what you did there. Well played, my cannon-wielding friend. Well played.
And in case i am not already on thin ice....
Did you know that it has been recognized in U.S. court that (under the right circumstances) DDOS can be considered a valid form of 1A protest? (Anonymous vs Paypal)
No, no, don't get wound up, I'm not implying anything, I just thought it was an interesting related anecdote to the private property analogy.
I respect the forum rules, and understand the need for (most of) them. /salute
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk 2