Moderator's statement
Having chosen to restate an opinion on public forum (rather than by PM) after a decision to edit/delete has obviously been made, demands an equally public response. Doing so is patently placing your personal thoughts as above the decisions of the administration and cannot and will not be condoned. All reference to this subject on this thread will be deleted.
Many of us feel that any connection to alcohol and guns has potential negative consequences, myself included BUT not withstanding any laws to the contrary, having drink should not be cause to disarm in and of itself. What was objected to in the deleted post was beyond good taste/decorum and was considered insulting is the following sentence:
Even if tongue-in-cheek, the mere hint that someone might forfeit their life for violation of your opinion of personal conduct is more than I am willing to accept.
Continued one man hammering at a single point of opinion also transcends what will be accepted on this forum - doing so becomes a form of trolling. The site owners define what the limits are on OCDO, not the individual registrants/users.
Having chosen to restate an opinion on public forum (rather than by PM) after a decision to edit/delete has obviously been made, demands an equally public response. Doing so is patently placing your personal thoughts as above the decisions of the administration and cannot and will not be condoned. All reference to this subject on this thread will be deleted.
Many of us feel that any connection to alcohol and guns has potential negative consequences, myself included BUT not withstanding any laws to the contrary, having drink should not be cause to disarm in and of itself. What was objected to in the deleted post was beyond good taste/decorum and was considered insulting is the following sentence:
"If they get lucky, your kin might find you hog tied in a sack somewhere downstream in Back Creek."
Even if tongue-in-cheek, the mere hint that someone might forfeit their life for violation of your opinion of personal conduct is more than I am willing to accept.
Continued one man hammering at a single point of opinion also transcends what will be accepted on this forum - doing so becomes a form of trolling. The site owners define what the limits are on OCDO, not the individual registrants/users.