This Looks Really Bad For Open Carry

[thx997303]

imported post

OH FORGIVE ME FOR I HAVE SINNED AGAINST THE ALMIGHTY SMOKING357!

MY IMAGINATION IS NOT LARGE ENOUGH TO ENVELOPE HIS EARTH SHATTERING IDEALS!

Better put: How can you be so virulently against the oppression you perceive from the police force that is currently installed in this country, while supporting the obamanation that would so quickly turn this country into a full blown police state were it not for the rabid oppositin that has sprung forth?

 

[smoking357]

imported post

thx997303 wrote:

Better put: How can you be so virulently against the oppression you perceive from the police force that is currently installed in this country, while supporting the obamanation that would so quickly turn this country into a full blown police state were it not for the rabid oppositin that has sprung forth?

I don't know what "obamanation" is, but I believe that Obama's vision of government involves a substantial restraint of governmental force applied against its own citizens and the citizens of the world.

If big government is inescapable, I'd quickly trade Obama's peaceful version for this brutal example.

He is, however, starting to lose my trust. There are lots of crimes committed by the Bushies for lying us into war and for the torture of prisoners that Obama has not prosecuted. We're also still in Iraq and Afghanistan, and those wars need to end, now. He needs to get moving on having this country atone for the crimes of the past eight years.

 

[KansasMustang]

imported post

smoking357 wrote:

thx997303 wrote:

Better put: How can you be so virulently against the oppression you perceive from the police force that is currently installed in this country, while supporting the obamanation that would so quickly turn this country into a full blown police state were it not for the rabid oppositin that has sprung forth?

I don't know what "obamanation" is, but I believe that Obama's vision of government involves a substantial restraint of governmental force applied against its own citizens and the citizens of the world.

If big government is inescapable, I'd quickly trade Obama's peaceful version for this brutal example.

He is, however, starting to lose my trust. There are lots of crimes committed by the Bushies for lying us into war and for the torture of prisoners that Obama has not prosecuted. We're also still in Iraq and Afghanistan, and those wars need to end, now. He needs to get moving on having this country atone for the crimes of the past eight years.

Substantial restraint? Torture of prisoners? Crimes of the last 8 years?? You sir are a raging PROGRESSIVE!! Were it not for the fact that I am a firm believer in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights I would tell you as the "Anointed One" has done,
SHUT UP!!!!
You can spout that BS on any of the RADICAL blogs. But I'm thinkin' you'll find very little if any support here.
Those that trade their liberty for security lose both quickly. Obama ststed that he will have a civilian defense force as well trained and funded as our Armed Forces. For WHAT PURPOSE??? I sir will have NONE of it.
Keep your powder dry!
Edited for spelling error only

 

[thx997303]

imported post

And of course we see again that smoking357 must indeed be smoking something.

 

[KansasMustang]

imported post

Drinkin' Kool-aid more likely

 

[smoking357]

imported post

KansasMustang wrote:

Substantial restraint? Torture of prisoners? Crimes of the last 8 years?? You sir are a raging PROGRESSIVE!! Were it not for the fact that I am a firm believer in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights I would tell you as the "Anointed One" has done,
SHUT UP!!!!
You can spout that BS on any of the RADICAL blogs. But I'm thinkin' you'll find very little if any support here.
Those that trade their liberty for security lose both quickly. Obama ststed that he will have a civilian defense force as well trained and funded as our Armed Forces. For WHAT PURPOSE??? I sir will have NONE of it.
Keep your powder dry!
Edited for spelling error only

Nope. Libertarian. Did you see my chart? Read LewRockwell.com, every day. It's good for you. His slogan is: "Anti-state, anti-war, pro-market." When you see the arguments, you'll change your mind about governmental force, power and war.

Needless to say, we're all very pro-gun.

By the way, the Second Amendment also speaks highly of a civilian defense force. I'd argue that's all we need. Send the military home, and let's stop all that spending. That viewpoint used to be considered Conservative until after WWII.

 

[thx997303]

imported post

You sgow support for a president that would gladly turn this entire country into a police state, while claiming to be for outright freedom for the individual.

These two things do not mix.

 

[smoking357]

imported post

thx997303 wrote:

You sgow support for a president that would gladly turn this entire country into a police state, while claiming to be for outright freedom for the individual.

These two things do not mix.

I just don't see Obama as a terrible evil. I have hope that he'll pull us back from the anti-American: Patriot Act, War on Terruh, airports becoming gulags, prisoner torture, rendition, lying us into war, Department of Homeland Security, etc.

 

[thx997303]

imported post

Yeah, good luck with your lunacy.

Seriously, GTFO! I'm tired of your crap. Emmigrate already, stop just talking about it and do it.

You are no friend to liberty. GTFO!

 

[McX]

imported post

Hmm, well according to the picture Jesus carries an M16. I always wondered. Guess that's why they call it Heaven. CC and OC ok up there. Still wonder what God himself carries.

 

[KansasMustang]

imported post

smoking357 wrote:

KansasMustang wrote:

Substantial restraint? Torture of prisoners? Crimes of the last 8 years?? You sir are a raging PROGRESSIVE!! Were it not for the fact that I am a firm believer in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights I would tell you as the "Anointed One" has done,
SHUT UP!!!!
You can spout that BS on any of the RADICAL blogs. But I'm thinkin' you'll find very little if any support here.
Those that trade their liberty for security lose both quickly. Obama ststed that he will have a civilian defense force as well trained and funded as our Armed Forces. For WHAT PURPOSE??? I sir will have NONE of it.
Keep your powder dry!
Edited for spelling error only

Nope. Libertarian. Did you see my chart? Read LewRockwell.com, every day. It's good for you. His slogan is: "Anti-state, anti-war, pro-market." When you see the arguments, you'll change your mind about governmental force, power and war.

Needless to say, we're all very pro-gun.

By the way, the Second Amendment also speaks highly of a civilian defense force. I'd argue that's all we need. Send the military home, and let's stop all that spending. That viewpoint used to be considered Conservative until after WWII.

Libertarian? No sir, I am a libertarian, lean a little to the right, I'll grant you that, but if you can't see past the end of your nose that's YOUR problem. If you can't percieve the National Socialist Progressive machine being put together hidden in plain view right in front of you then as i previously stated you are suckin way too much at the Kool-Aid bowl.
The 2A as we all know calls for "a well regulated militia" not a civilian force under control of the administration. You state your case as would an educated idiot. The civilian defense force is US. When danger confronts the Republic we and all good PATRIOTS would come to it's defense.
I'm sorry sir but you are either misinformed or choose to see things through red tinted glasses. The Obama administration is in the process of destroying this country systematically through overspending, and the takeover of industry,indoctrination, and "health insurance" reform. And, as I stated previously, I personally, and most of the folks I know are having NONE of it. He has quadrupled the deficit in seven short months. He has made more appointments of self avowed communists and socialists and has trampled the constitution more times than any of us can count.
The last time I bought a weapon and filled out that damn form I believe I had to check a block that stated "I am not now, nor ever have been a member of the communist party" Most of his "Czars" couldn't in truth check that block, nor for that matter could they pass an investigation to recieve just a small portion of the TS SBI SCI Security clearance I held while I was in the Army.
I believe it was previously mistated but I'll state it in military correctness here:
BLOW it out your FIFTH point of contact Smoking357.

 

[thx997303]

imported post

Good news, his kool-aid drinking self has been banned.

 

[Milbars]

imported post

EDIT: Disregard, I found the thread.

 

[gs78]

imported post

smoking357 wrote:

thx997303 wrote:

Better put: How can you be so virulently against the oppression you perceive from the police force that is currently installed in this country, while supporting the obamanation that would so quickly turn this country into a full blown police state were it not for the rabid oppositin that has sprung forth?

I don't know what "obamanation" is, but I believe that Obama's vision of government involves a substantial restraint of governmental force applied against its own citizens and the citizens of the world.

If big government is inescapable, I'd quickly trade Obama's peaceful version for this brutal example.

He is, however, starting to lose my trust. There are lots of crimes committed by the Bushies for lying us into war and for the torture of prisoners that Obama has not prosecuted. We're also still in Iraq and Afghanistan, and those wars need to end, now. He needs to get moving on having this country atone for the crimes of the past eight years.

Pardon me for jumping right in the middle of this discussion, but you seem like an ASSHOLE.:what:

 

[thx997303]

imported post

Welcome to the forum. If you are referring to smoking357, don't worry, he has been banned.

 

[PrayingForWar]

imported post

thx997303 wrote:

Good news, his kool-aid drinking self has been banned.

:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate


GOOD RIDDANCE!!!

 

[KansasMustang]

imported post

PrayingForWar wrote:

thx997303 wrote:

Good news, his kool-aid drinking self has been banned.

:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate


GOOD RIDDANCE!!!

I'll second that !!!!!:monkey:monkey:monkey:monkey:monkey:monkey:monkey:monkey

 

[PT111]

imported post

PrayingForWar wrote:

thx997303 wrote:

Good news, his kool-aid drinking self has been banned.

:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate


GOOD RIDDANCE!!!

When did this happen!!!! First Stylze and now Smokin? I suppose I am next!

 

[PrayingForWar]

imported post

PT111 wrote:

PrayingForWar wrote:

thx997303 wrote:

Good news, his kool-aid drinking self has been banned.

:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate


GOOD RIDDANCE!!!

When did this happen!!!! First Stylze and now Smokin? I suppose I am next!

No worries, you're not nearly as big an a$$h0!e as I am. I'm still here. Both of those clowns were only here to create problems anyway. As much as I can't stand leftist twits, I wouldn't have been happy at their banning if they were at least conversational. For example, I can't stand "the donkey", but at leats he doesn't come off as a smug elitist a$$clown. I disagree with %99 of everything he's posted, but he's not an a$$hole about it, which is a rare trait amoung the left. (and perhaps the right, but I'm biased).

 

[The Donkey]

imported post

Thanks, I think.

My family and I visited Jefferson's Monticello this weekend. The guide pointed out that Jefferson kept a bust of his fierce Federalist opponent Alexander Hamilton in his parlor, along with those of other heros of the revolution.

Now I'm not about to order a portrait of President Reagan for my living room, butthink there is something to learn from T.J.'s example.