I'm gonna follow up on what TabFry posted as reading through these six pages I noted the exact same thing. Two VERY similar usernames same start up time. Family Members? And a son that came to bolster the claim.
The Patch story could have been written right out of the quotes in these six pages. Easily, throw a name in of a known officer and bang, there you have it. There are no NEW confirmable facts in the Patch story. Sure, there are a couple of Items that make it MORE dramatic. "Planned" "Unnamed Witness" But again ALL the basic statements are the same ones as were posted on here by our two new posters.
It's easy to quote someone, why just the other day I was talking to Danica Patrick, she was telling me how hard an impact she took in her last crash into the wall and how the following car took out her left side door and almost went up over the hood of her car. I was shocked at how different she is with out the make up and GoDaddy poses.
Did I really? Who knows, sure all of the above happened, but it could have be gathered through video, and photos. Danica may have told me or told a camera.
The point is there is nothing new in the Patch story, just some dramatic inclusions. There needs to be cross referenced conclusive stories. It what makes them believable as confirmed, the DIFFERENT facts that pop up in different stories of the same event, because no two people see it the same way.
By the way we are DAYS out of this incident, Next of Kin should be done within 24hours, so why is there no name released to this and why no Company confirmation? Heck when Champion took it in the teeth, their manager came on with explanations.
If it is true, then I would have some serious issues with a company willing to cover up a DEATH at their facility. Starts me questioning integrity.
Gun Deaths are a hot button topic now. This should be all over the news.
I'm not calling this one way or the other, but I am playing devils advocate on a VERY Hot Button Topic.
The Patch story could have been written right out of the quotes in these six pages. Easily, throw a name in of a known officer and bang, there you have it. There are no NEW confirmable facts in the Patch story. Sure, there are a couple of Items that make it MORE dramatic. "Planned" "Unnamed Witness" But again ALL the basic statements are the same ones as were posted on here by our two new posters.
It's easy to quote someone, why just the other day I was talking to Danica Patrick, she was telling me how hard an impact she took in her last crash into the wall and how the following car took out her left side door and almost went up over the hood of her car. I was shocked at how different she is with out the make up and GoDaddy poses.
Did I really? Who knows, sure all of the above happened, but it could have be gathered through video, and photos. Danica may have told me or told a camera.
The point is there is nothing new in the Patch story, just some dramatic inclusions. There needs to be cross referenced conclusive stories. It what makes them believable as confirmed, the DIFFERENT facts that pop up in different stories of the same event, because no two people see it the same way.
By the way we are DAYS out of this incident, Next of Kin should be done within 24hours, so why is there no name released to this and why no Company confirmation? Heck when Champion took it in the teeth, their manager came on with explanations.
If it is true, then I would have some serious issues with a company willing to cover up a DEATH at their facility. Starts me questioning integrity.
Gun Deaths are a hot button topic now. This should be all over the news.
I'm not calling this one way or the other, but I am playing devils advocate on a VERY Hot Button Topic.