• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Shooting Today at the Oit in Capitol Forest.

Bear 45/70

Regular Member
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
3,256
Location
Union, Washington, USA
imported post

just_a_car wrote:
Bear 45/70 wrote:
compmanio365 wrote:
Dammit, that makes me want a 1911 even more seeing that vid. :D
Everyone should have at least one 1911! Better yet one of each manufacturer, model and variation there of also.
I agree on the first one. I really want a Kimber Pro CDP II, but just can't justify the price. I just love the blued frame and silver-colored and/or chromed slide look on a 1911 with rosewood grips; so sexy.

You mean like the middle one on the right?

Autopistols.jpg
 

just_a_car

Regular Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
2,558
Location
Auburn, Washington, USA
imported post

Bear 45/70 wrote:
You mean like the middle one on the right?
Nope, like this: http://www.gilbertsguns.com/Handguns/Kimber/Kimber+Pro+CDP+II+45+ACP+Pistol

The one you show above has a silver-colored slide and frame; I'm talking silver slide and blued frame. Plus, the one you show has black grips, I'm looking for reddish-wood (rosewood, cocobolo, etc) grips. I do like the rubber front-wrap-around style, though and I've seen them on reddish-wood setups.
 

Bear 45/70

Regular Member
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
3,256
Location
Union, Washington, USA
imported post

just_a_car wrote:
Bear 45/70 wrote:
You mean like the middle one on the right?
Nope, like this: http://www.gilbertsguns.com/Handguns/Kimber/Kimber+Pro+CDP+II+45+ACP+Pistol

The one you show above has a silver-colored slide and frame; I'm talking silver slide and blued frame. Plus, the one you show has black grips, I'm looking for reddish-wood (rosewood, cocobolo, etc) grips. I do like the rubber front-wrap-around style, though and I've seen them on reddish-wood setups.
So you think the two tone Kimber is better than a custom Colt Officers, polished stainless? Idifferently don't agree. Could have bought a Kimber, but bought the Colt instead. The wrap arounf fits the hand better, at least mine and the wife's.
 

G20-IWB24/7

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2007
Messages
886
Location
Tacoma, WA, ,
imported post

Bear, what vintage are your Detonics on the left side of your photo? They're nice. I sure would like to get one of the older (1970's era) Detonics Combat Masters in hard chrome to use as a back up gun. They just have more character than a3" Kimber or SA.
 

Bear 45/70

Regular Member
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
3,256
Location
Union, Washington, USA
imported post

G20-IWB24/7 wrote:
Bear, what vintage are your Detonics on the left side of your photo? They're nice. I sure would like to get one of the older (1970's era) Detonics Combat Masters in hard chrome to use as a back up gun. They just have more character than a3" Kimber or SA.
Good eye to know they are Detonics. The bottom one is a "Seattle" stamped Mark I with a serial number in 1974in thecut, welded and remachined frames and slides series. The top one is also also "Seattle" stamp Mark I made in 1978with an Essex's frame built just for Detonics. We had a Pocket 9, but it was nowhere near the gun the Mark series guns are. Have never seen a blowback 9mm that worked worth a damn.
 

Bill Starks

State Researcher
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Messages
4,304
Location
Nortonville, KY, USA
imported post

Bear 45/70 wrote:
Good eye to know they are Detonics. The bottom one is a "Seattle" stamped Mark I with a serial number in 1974in thecut, welded and remachined frames and slides series. The top one is also also "Seattle" stamp Mark I made in 1978with an Essex's frame built just for Detonics. We had a Pocket 9, but it was nowhere near the gun the Mark series guns are. Have never seen a blowback 9mm that worked worth a damn.
That one I shot had great hadling except the grip was a little small/short for my hand. Its the kind of gun I've been looking for to CC. I figure a extended mag would solve my polite pinky issue as the bullets fly.
 

Bear 45/70

Regular Member
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
3,256
Location
Union, Washington, USA
imported post

M1Gunr wrote:
Bear 45/70 wrote:
Good eye to know they are Detonics. The bottom one is a "Seattle" stamped Mark I with a serial number in 1974in thecut, welded and remachined frames and slides series. The top one is also also "Seattle" stamp Mark I made in 1978with an Essex's frame built just for Detonics. We had a Pocket 9, but it was nowhere near the gun the Mark series guns are. Have never seen a blowback 9mm that worked worth a damn.
That one I shot had great hadling except the grip was a little small/short for my hand. Its the kind of gun I've been looking for to CC. I figure a extended mag would solve my polite pinky issue as the bullets fly.
My wife is the only person I ever met that doesn't think the grips aretoo short on the Detonics. But they were designed for the CIA shooters and hiding them was more important the a longer grip.
 

TechnoWeenie

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
2,084
Location
, ,
imported post

I know of a pit out there.......


But where is this 'Oit' that you speak of?
 

just_a_car

Regular Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
2,558
Location
Auburn, Washington, USA
imported post

sv_libertarian wrote:
Trigger Dr wrote:
OUCH !!!!
Playing with the .22's again? :p

WHAT WAS THAT FROM? !!!!:what:
Looks to me like he didn't have it shouldered properly... like it was against his upper arm and not in the crook of the shoulder.

Either that, or when it hit his shoulder, it burst the blood vessels in the shoulder, causing severe internal bleeding.

Either way, not something I want to happen. My guess is it was something like .600NE, .700NE, or .577T-Rex.
 

just_a_car

Regular Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
2,558
Location
Auburn, Washington, USA
imported post

Trigger Dr wrote:
That was a hand loaded .22:D:D

50/110 Sharps, 570 gr cast lead, 110 gr 2ffg.
I stand corrected... but I'd almost wager the recoil of that thing is near the same as a .600NE (not knowing the recoil of either, other than "ow!")
 

just_a_car

Regular Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
2,558
Location
Auburn, Washington, USA

Trigger Dr

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2007
Messages
2,760
Location
Wa, ,
imported post

The rifle has double set triggers and when he set the trigger BEFORE he shouldered the gun, instead of when he was set and ready to shot, he bumped the trigger (12 oz release) with the gun halfway there.
 
Top