Ah, opinion pieces rather than facts (from liberal sites to boot). Got it.
Link 1:from Declassified Transcripts Of Benghazi Briefings (research, not opinion)
Link 2: includes quotes from committee members (example: "GOP Rep. Howard “Buck” McKeon, the Republican chair of the House Armed Services Committee, says he’s satisfied with how the US military – and ergo the Obama administration – responded to the deadly attack on the US consulate in Benghazi, Libya that killed four Americans, including the US ambassador to Libya."
Link 3: all statements taken from the CIA timeline of events (take it as you will, it's part of the record.)
Link 4: researched from the Accountability Review Board report on Benghazi Attack which is provided in the link.
Link 5:Uses direct, un-breitbarted quotes from the Senate Select Committee On Intelligence. (example: "The Committee has reviewed the allegations that U.S. personnel, including in the IC or DoD, prevented the mounting of any military relief effort during the attacks, but the Committee has not found any of these allegations to be substantiated. [Review Of The Terrorist Attacks On U.S. Facilities In Benghazi, Libya, September 11-12, 2012, U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, 1/15/14]."
Link 6: Uses direct quotes from the report issued by the House Armed Services Committee Republicans. (example: "“Given the military’s preparations on September 11, 2012, majority members have not yet discerned any response alternatives that could have likely changed the outcome of the Benghazi attack,” the report concludes."
Link 7: Another listing of the CIA time line.
Link 8: Uses testimony from Gregory Hicks who was deputy chief of mission in Libya the night of the attacks to debunk "stand down" myth.