lprgcFrank
Regular Member
imported post
After the smackdown in Harrisburg to the anti's this week. I'm doing more OC'ing. Who else is?
After the smackdown in Harrisburg to the anti's this week. I'm doing more OC'ing. Who else is?
I am in Allentown on business about once a month. I will be there next the first or second week of November. If anyone is in the area, maybe we could have an OC get together in NorthEast PA?After the smackdown in Harrisburg to the anti's this week. I'm doing more OC'ing. Who else is?
Sounds great! I will be up there either the first or second week of November. I will let you know when I firm up the dates.jpierce let me know the dates of when you are coming up here.. I am about 50 min from allentown
I don't mean to be overly critical but PA issues"License to Carry Firearms." This LTCF is sometimes needed to open carry in PA (vehicles, Philedelphia, during emergencies, and maybe at K-12 schools, if that question ever gets sorted out).We chatted aboutthe PA and Phila laws and where OC is legal and how to get a PA CCW.
lprgcFrank wrote:
We chatted aboutthe PA and Phila laws and where OC is legal and how to get a PA CCW.
I don't mean to be overly critical but PA issues"License to Carry Firearms." This LTCF is sometimes needed to open carry in PA (vehicles, Philedelphia, during emergencies, and maybe at K-12 schools, if that question ever gets sorted out).
I never understood the term CCW anyway...but my point is that gun rights experts should use precise terminology at all times - PA does not issue a concealed weapons permit - it issues a "License to Carry Firearms."
VA issues a "Concealed Handgun Permit."
Etc.
It is my belief that our lawmakers purposefully befuddle our the language to pull the wool over our eyes and require us to seek 'professional' assistance when things become grey. The cost of this 'professional' assistance soon becomes prohibitive and therefore unconstititional acts become accepted by default. If no one challenges the government's definition of 'is' then the government's definition is accepted as common practice.
The point is legislators can be very precise when it wants to define terms and very vague when it suits their interests....
lprgcFrank wrote:I don't mean to be overly critical but PA issues"License to Carry Firearms." This LTCF is sometimes needed to open carry in PA (vehicles, Philedelphia, during emergencies, and maybe at K-12 schools, if that question ever gets sorted out).We chatted aboutthe PA and Phila laws and where OC is legal and how to get a PA CCW.
I never understood the term CCW anyway...but my point is that gun rights experts should use precise terminology at all times - PA does not issue a concealed weapons permit - it issues a "License to Carry Firearms."
VA issues a "Concealed Handgun Permit."
Etc.
And two courts have held that open carry is legal with LTCF: Commonwealth v. Ortiz and one other case that escapes me.Mike wrote:lprgcFrank wrote:I don't mean to be overly critical but PA issues"License to Carry Firearms." This LTCF is sometimes needed to open carry in PA (vehicles, Philedelphia, during emergencies, and maybe at K-12 schools, if that question ever gets sorted out).We chatted aboutthe PA and Phila laws and where OC is legal and how to get a PA CCW.
I never understood the term CCW anyway...but my point is that gun rights experts should use precise terminology at all times - PA does not issue a concealed weapons permit - it issues a "License to Carry Firearms."
VA issues a "Concealed Handgun Permit."
Etc.
Since we're talking about the complete lack of consistancy in wording.
A LTCF is really just a concealed carry permit :what:Thats what the law states.
While it says licence to carry firearms, the statue specifically states that it is only for concealed carry. This is a basis for questioning open carry legality within philadelphia since you must have a licence to carry, however the Philadelphia law doesn't say you have to conceal only that you must have a licence, however it might be argued that its then implied that you must, however the letter of the law doesn't specify. Its a helluva twist.
§ 6109. Licenses.
(a) Purpose of license.--A license to carry a firearm shall be for the purpose of carrying a firearm concealed on or about one's person or in a vehicle throughout this Commonwealth.
...
The real misconceptions come from the stupid title of this code
§ 6106. Firearms not to be carried without a license.
The title basically says you can't carry without a license and since a license is only for concealed carry you start to worry about open carry legality. However to confuse the issue
--(a) Offense defined.--Any person who carries a firearm in any vehicle or any person who carries a firearm concealed on or about his person, except in his place of abode or fixed place of business, without a valid and lawfully issued license under this chapter commits a felony of the third degree.
So not surprisingly it screws with your mind.
Because really the title should read
Firearms not to be carried concealed without a license.
And these people are supposed to be lawyers? Clueless morons.