UTOC-45-44
Regular Member
imported post
Pa. Patriot wrote:I was a little surprised this was posted:
http://www.pafoa.org/forum/concealed-open-carry-121/6567-open-carry-luzerne-co-particulary-mtn-top-wilkes-barre-page-3.html#post79094
Is it me or is this ironic that an LEO makes a perfect case of what's wrong with some LEO's?
I don't see anything wrong with the exchange of opinions. Couple of guys are dubious about the value of OC and some people support it.
One guy got accused of being "condescending" but I think he was just stating his point of view. Which was biased, of course. And wrong. But hardly condescending.
You know, you never know when a discussion or argument might break out in a discussion forum!
I favor OC, so I'm not buying the LEO's arguments. But he does have a point about potential disarming of an OCer. We had someone here on this forum who was disarmed forcibly a while back. Luckily it was just a security guard who just walked up to a OCer and took his gun away from him. If it had been a bad guy, it would have been bad.
Hey, if during a discussion about something that interests many discussants, someone disagrees, then that's generally a good thing. Then, the side that has the best logic, the best premises, the best arguments will prevail. The good ideas will float to the top, like cream. The bad ideas will fall away.
Yes, he was armed.
Just a Glock 26:uhoh:.
His 9MM v.s my 44Mag:lol:. ( 2-3 of his is equal to 1 half of mine:lol: )
I just did NOT wanna make more of the situation than absolutely necessary.
Could you imaging me being dress in Wranglers, Cowboy Hat and Cowboy Boots being involved in Tussel/Shoot-out with a Glock ArmedSec Guard???:what:...:lol:
The News Channels would have had a Hay-Day with a "WILD WEST" shoot-out @ 5 o'clock News:lol:...:monkey...:lol:
CowBoy up, "Pistol" Pete:monkey
ROTFLMAO:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:UTOC-45-44 wrote:Yes, he was armed.
Just a Glock 26:uhoh:.
His 9MM v.s my 44Mag:lol:. ( 2-3 of his is equal to 1 half of mine:lol: )
I just did NOT wanna make more of the situation than absolutely necessary.
Could you imaging me being dress in Wranglers, Cowboy Hat and Cowboy Boots being involved in Tussel/Shoot-out with a Glock ArmedSec Guard???:what:...:lol:
The News Channels would have had a Hay-Day with a "WILD WEST" shoot-out @ 5 o'clock News:lol:...:monkey...:lol:
CowBoy up, "Pistol" Pete:monkey
Hay-Day :lol::lol::lol::lol:I got a laugh out of this one!
"Armed Citizen Puts Beat Down On Local Security Guard"
"Armed Security Guard Attempts To Disarm Law Abiding Citizen"
"High Noon! Armed Combatants Gun Each Other Down"
"Wild Wild West Goes Down In Local Store"
Ad infinitum...
Which one ??? Who ???sure it's not a troll out to have some online fun?
Guy from Utah. Going through a Wal-mart or other store. He was checking out and a guy walked up to him and just lifted his .44 magnum out of its holster. (Apparently no retention in the holster.) The taker turned out to be a security guard. Police were called. The OCer was given his gun back and released since he was perfectly legal. Take-ee was p*ssed.danbus wrote:Yes, please do. The guy was obviously in condition white if it happened like that.HankT wrote:I'm sorry, I don't recall that incident, could you perhaps refresh my memory?We had someone here on this forum who was disarmed forcibly a while back. Luckily it was just a security guard who just walked up to a OCer and took his gun away from him.
^^^^^^^^^^
http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/forum52/2469-4.html
Stop picking on others, or no kool-aid for you.
Hah, not you, meant HankT.unrequited wrote:^^^^^^^^^^
http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/forum52/2469-4.html
Stop picking on others, or no kool-aid for you.
I'm not picking on others... I'm picking on HankT
Better yet pay attention and don't let anyone get close enough to disarm you.kurtmax_0 wrote:Never rely on "the right holster." Retention training is the better bet, and alertness is always necessary. When you start feeling too safe with the high-retention holster, you let your guard down. As with any part of gun safety, the primary safety device is you.Being forcibly disarmed would be kind of difficult if you have the right holster.
Drewesque wrote:Better yet pay attention and don't let anyone get close enough to disarm you.kurtmax_0 wrote:Never rely on "the right holster." Retention training is the better bet, and alertness is always necessary. When you start feeling too safe with the high-retention holster, you let your guard down. As with any part of gun safety, the primary safety device is you.Being forcibly disarmed would be kind of difficult if you have the right holster.
Why did the SG try to take this persons side arm, was he threatened by it? Or did he just figured that he wanted to play "REAL LEO that day? Did he think that this person was going to pay for his items/groceries first and then rob the place? Or did he just suffer from "Cerebral Rectal Displacement"?Reverend73 wrote:Guy from Utah. Going through a Wal-mart or other store. He was checking out and a guy walked up to him and just lifted his .44 magnum out of its holster. (Apparently no retention in the holster.) The taker turned out to be a security guard. Police were called. The OCer was given his gun back and released since he was perfectly legal. Take-ee was p*ssed.danbus wrote:Yes, please do. The guy was obviously in condition white if it happened like that.HankT wrote:I'm sorry, I don't recall that incident, could you perhaps refresh my memory?We had someone here on this forum who was disarmed forcibly a while back. Luckily it was just a security guard who just walked up to a OCer and took his gun away from him.
Odd, that you all don't remember it. It was obviously a noteworthy occurence. And indisputably reported--by the take-ee.