mach1chris
Regular Member
Do we get to throw this post back at you if you start spouting statist BS?
Sent from my M865 using Tapatalk
jajaj!!!... Please do if it ever does happen.
Do we get to throw this post back at you if you start spouting statist BS?
Sent from my M865 using Tapatalk
I salute you, Mach1Chris!
You have, indeed, chosen a worthy vocation.
In your career you'll have countless opportunities to be a blessing those you've sworn to protect and serve.
I believe that the way the fellow officer acted was wrong, but if you were in his shoes and saw a man walking down the street at 1am would you or would you not be a little suspicious about it?...
Rick H:
Thanks for posting and starting this thread which has elicited much beneficial discussion.
One suggestion: if something like this ever happens again, begin by being respectful and cooperative. Who knows, it may make a difference in the ultimate outcome of an encounter such as this.
Huh!?!?!
The OPer doesn't particularly relate being disrespectful or impolite to the cop. And, from what I can tell the OPer cooperated with the cop to the full extent required by law.
Are you saying he should waive his rights next time?
And, where in the constitution does it say rights must be exercised politely or respectfully?
Lets keep this in perspective. Lets take a look at some real non-cooperation and disrespect. The OPer didn't punch the cop, he didn't try to knife the cop, he didn't run and make the cop chase him through yards risking a twisted ankle or clotheslined throat.
Respect? Cooperation? Two way street, Mister. Will you be writing that police department "suggesting" the officer start his next encounter by being respectful, rather than deceitful, and cooperating with the citizen when the citizen exercises his rights?
Lets face it. That nasty little cop meant to detain the OPer from the outset. He meant to dig into the OPers business, whether the OPer exercised his rights or not. He had no intention of respecting the OPers rights from the moment he approached the OPer.
Rights are rights are rights are rights. They don't need justification. They don't need an explanation. The justifications and explanations were figured out long, long ago. They're not there to make interesting conversation when confronted by a cop or government. Literally over a million Americans have died defending them. Some of them go back almost literally 800 years to Magna Carta. Most were paid for in blood before the American Revolution. Blood! dammit. Countless millions have suffered for lack of them, or died. A cop's curiosity and your opinion pale into pathetic insignificance against the historical record and the cost of obtaining rights.
When all of this started there was a point of respect from both sides other than my private affairs being investigated and the feeling that I was being interagated as a criminal. I showed respect through and through, But, when it came to the officers turn to Respect my wishes to not be consulted about my personal information he then began to show his disrespect toward myself. I did still show restraint and respect toward him throughout the whole Incident. I did not feel I should say thank you or anything when departing because I felt violated and did not say anything other than am I free to go and walk away after being released.
So as to the question of was I disrespectful the answer is no, did I give any other reason to be disrespectfull other than saying no I will not show my id? NO. I was polite all the way through.
I disagree.
I agree with your disagreement. NEVER talk to police.
I've been fortunate in my lifetime. I've never had an altercation with a law enforcement officer, never been mistreated by one, nor oppressed by one.
I suppose if I had suffered oppression and harassment by members of the law enforcement community, I'd be able to share some of the ill will for them that some folks seem to have.
I've been fortunate in my lifetime. I've never had an altercation with a law enforcement officer, never been mistreated by one, nor oppressed by one.
SNIP In fact, I know of no one personally who has suffered at the hands of an LEO. In fact, the only knowledge of "bad" experiences I have are of those I read here on these forums.
I find that very interesting.
My personal belief is that most encounters with LEOs are driven as much by our own attitude as the officers'.
And, you're absolutely correct citizen. You don't HAVE to be polite. However, I've asked, several times, what is accomplished by NOT being polite other than inflaming the situation. If you've got an officer who IS being professional, step off by being an arse to him, you are to blame should he become one himself. If you get an officer who is being one himself from the start, how does being a butthead change things?
Now, I don't need to see any biased blogs or videos that don't show the entire story posted by, yet again, biased people, all with an agenda to prove. I have my own personal life's experiences, the life's experiences by people I know and trust to back up my points.
And, regarding the NY stuff, I've never denied there are rotten examples of cops out there. There are rotten examples of ANY job, in ANY profession. In fact, there are rotten examples of ANY group of people. My point is the seething hatred and mistrust of cops makes people look as foolish as anyone who engages in discrimination based on biased, emotional, knee-jerk propaganda.
I'd say those are the people who need to wake up, take the blinders off and see the bigger picture.
I see just fine thank you.
Now, I don't need to see any biased blogs or videos that don't show the entire story posted by, yet again, biased people, all with an agenda to prove. I have my own personal life's experiences, the life's experiences by people I know and trust to back up my points.
My point is the seething hatred and mistrust of cops makes people look as foolish as anyone who engages in discrimination based on biased, emotional, knee-jerk propaganda.
What about another group, say, Child Molesters. Will you chastise seething hatred and mistrust of them?