deepdiver
Campaign Veteran
That arraignment was interesting. If that is the judge for the trial I think they are going to have big problems. He made his opinion of the situation pretty clear.
That arraignment was interesting. If that is the judge for the trial I think they are going to have big problems. He made his opinion of the situation pretty clear.
March 31st, 9am
Downtown Detroit... I think its 3rd district court.
Still going through court. Nothing to report yet.Updates??
a week from Friday [5/26] is pretrial. trial is set for June 5th I think. I'll confirm when I know.
Any news. Let's hope it's good.
James Baker said:Update on my case:
After I was arrested on Feb 5th, the prosecution dropped the three misdemeanors they originally charged me with. They replaced those three charges with a felony and two misdemeanor charges, up to nearly 6 years in prison. All of my guns were ordered to be confiscated, I was ordered to have a GPS tether on that keeps me in the house, and I was locked up pending paying the $50,000 cash surety bond for my release.
My first court date thereafter that arraignment, the prosecution attempted to lock me back up and take my $50,000 cash bond, all because I apparently did not turn in any firearms (all of which were sold lawfully well-ahead of time. The judge let me stay out, under the condition that my fiancé turn in her collection of firearms (so that I theoretically have zero access to firearms).
The next few court dates were as equally telling, as the prosecution refused to offer either Brandon or I any kind of plea deal, which is surprising. We had been floating in this vacancy of judges at the Wayne County 3rd Circuit Court, having each of these pretrial hearings in front of whatever veteran judge was available.
We went before one of these veteran judges a few weeks ago. My excellent attorney, Jim Makowski, filed a motion to quash my felony charge. The judge ruled in my favor, making the case that my Concealed Pistol License had been incorrectly confiscated and not returned, which means that there was no way I could have allegedly felony carried a concealed weapon. That charge, my only felony, was dismissed. It's dismissal also necessitated dismissing Brandon's correlating felony concealed carry charge.
Now, out of seemingly nowhere, Gov Rick Snyder up in Lansing appointed a judge to fill the vacancy we had been floating in. The judge he appointed is a female, anti-gun former prosecutor from Dearborn, the city of the arrest. This already seemed like the case is fixed from the Capitol on down, or else it is an amazing coincidence.
Today, this new judge, the Honorable Mariam Saad Bazzi, reversed the dismissal of the felony, denied our motion for an interlocutory appeal, denied our motion for her to recuse herself, denied our motion to suppress illegal evidence, and even denied our motion to move the trial date due to a schedule conflict. My felony is back, and an ugly trial is just around the corner.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is your coercive, monopolized justice system. A backroom deal from Lansing down is at play here, and my freedom, even yours, is at stake.
Felony convictions for both. Not good.
I find it highly interesting that neither the Freep nor the Detroit News has anything about this as of this posting. In fact, the only thing I could find about it was posted on the Arab American News website after a google search of the names of the two individuals.
It that conviction was for Sec. 227.(2), then they aren't going to need to worry about carrying any firearms for a long, long time.Fox2Detroit"... Leonard resident James Baker, 24, and Jackson resident Brandon Vreeland, 40, were charged with carrying a concealed weapon and now both have been convicted..."
It that conviction was for Sec. 227.(2), then they aren't going to need to worry about carrying any firearms for a long, long time.
You obviously have a more intimate knowledge of the case than I do, which firearm were they both convicted of carrying at the same time?The issue is they were both convicted of carrying the same firearm which is a logical impossibility.
Dumber still is that James' CPL was valid at the time, making this an impossible charge.
But we all know the court system doesn't operate on logic.
You obviously have a more intimate knowledge of the case than I do, which firearm were they both convicted of carrying at the same time?