matt2636
Regular Member
ha! i dont know why you even reply
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Another New Forum Rule
- Thread starter John Pierce
- Start date
- Status
ha! i dont know why you even reply
JoeSparky
Centurion
Matt2636,
It seems that i owe you an apology. The misspelling I was referring to was not in your post but rather another's.
BTW your positioning what you assume is my name in place of another word us juvenile at best. It could be construed as a personal attack----a rules violation but only if it was intentionally done!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It seems that i owe you an apology. The misspelling I was referring to was not in your post but rather another's.
BTW your positioning what you assume is my name in place of another word us juvenile at best. It could be construed as a personal attack----a rules violation but only if it was intentionally done!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
marshaul
Campaign Veteran
Hey, you have your very own thread. Far be it for me to oppose.
matt2636
Regular Member
ok pal
matt2636
Regular Member
well its a name. so go taddle if you must.
JoeSparky
Centurion
What I appreciate most on this forum is the willingness of most to comply with restrictions imposed by the forum owners and these folks are held in a position of esteem by me. Those others are not. Thankfully this number is small but seems to be growing of late.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
eye95
Well-known member
Considering what matt26236 was doing to Walking Wolf, the rule is quite necessary.
Considering the action that was taken, it is clear that the rule is as I presumed above. That avatar is WW's mark. Anyone else using it is either ignorant of that fact or dishonestly trying to confuse folks as to what WW is posting. Since matt demonstrated clearly in this thread that he was not ignorant of the effect of his behavior, it must have been deliberate.
Good rule. Good action taken.
Considering the action that was taken, it is clear that the rule is as I presumed above. That avatar is WW's mark. Anyone else using it is either ignorant of that fact or dishonestly trying to confuse folks as to what WW is posting. Since matt demonstrated clearly in this thread that he was not ignorant of the effect of his behavior, it must have been deliberate.
Good rule. Good action taken.
matt2636
Regular Member
looks like they wont enforce the forum rules that were ALREADY in place yet they will make forum rules to protect their buddies.
marshaul
Campaign Veteran
Since you're such a victim, why don't you move on to greener pastures? Why are you still here?
ron73440
Regular Member
marshaul
Campaign Veteran
matt2636
Regular Member
No no, he's a mature adult:
Then again... Counterstrike?
whats counterstrike? is it one of those online games you play in your moms basement? god dont tell me your another gamer who comes online and talks trash actin like they know everything. some of you guys are funny though.
matt2636
Regular Member
RAM!!! do you have a unicorn on your truck? i eat unicorns for breakfast. and dodge rams. and yes im 12 for responding to their response in which they respond and i respond. confusing i know so dont drop your potato chips on the key board when you are trying to understand what i just said.
Citizen
Founder's Club Member
Well, my avatar is a blank space under my username. But, since I wasn't the first to use that on this form, I guess I am in violation of the forum rules.
I personally object to any avatars. They're vain. I find them offensive. We need a new rule. No Avatars!
Anybody who can't just read the name beside the post is too illiterate to be typing here anyway. What did people do before avatars were invented? Just heave in replies without knowing to whom they were replying?
Can anybody make me an avatar that says "No more rules!"
I personally object to any avatars. They're vain. I find them offensive. We need a new rule. No Avatars!
Anybody who can't just read the name beside the post is too illiterate to be typing here anyway. What did people do before avatars were invented? Just heave in replies without knowing to whom they were replying?
Can anybody make me an avatar that says "No more rules!"
1245A Defender
Regular Member
Woah!!!
Thats like saying that everyone should wear a bag on their head.
Then everybody would always have to ask,,, who is that,,, is that you????
I like avitars. I see a gorilla, I know, I see, no stinkin badges, I know, I see unknown hunter, I know.
I like mine, never change it, It is personnal, It is a pic of the real life "me".
Thats like saying that everyone should wear a bag on their head.
Then everybody would always have to ask,,, who is that,,, is that you????
I like avitars. I see a gorilla, I know, I see, no stinkin badges, I know, I see unknown hunter, I know.
I like mine, never change it, It is personnal, It is a pic of the real life "me".
davidmcbeth
Banned
I change my avatar all the time ... am I now supposed to look through EVERY member's avatar to insure that I don't break a "rule".
Like laws passed, this issue is better suited not to be a rule but to allow people of the community and its members to handle these issues outside of a need for a rule.
I like Rodney's viewpoint .... next time "no rules!"
Like laws passed, this issue is better suited not to be a rule but to allow people of the community and its members to handle these issues outside of a need for a rule.
I like Rodney's viewpoint .... next time "no rules!"
1245A Defender
Regular Member
Yah, so
Up dating avitars is NOT a problem.
I have seen you and many others change to new ones, they think are cooler or betterer than the old ones...
Thats is not a dellema(sp).
The only time it has problem has been when an argumenter has COPIED an avitar of an oppenent during a back and foreth discousion.
It is a very special transgression.
The new rule is not realy pointed at anyone new to the forum that chooses an avitar.
Up dating avitars is NOT a problem.
I have seen you and many others change to new ones, they think are cooler or betterer than the old ones...
Thats is not a dellema(sp).
The only time it has problem has been when an argumenter has COPIED an avitar of an oppenent during a back and foreth discousion.
It is a very special transgression.
The new rule is not realy pointed at anyone new to the forum that chooses an avitar.
davidmcbeth
Banned
I agree it would be s special case that wolf was involved with ...
Here, an new avatar .... likey?
- Status