wilx.com poll

[PDinDetroit]

imported post

hopnpop wrote:

Bikenut wrote:

Odd how lefty's always demonize, demean, diminish, ridicule, or hide, any truth that does not further their agenda.

Hey now, I'm left-handed and I resent that remark!! :cuss: Don't hate the lefties!!! (hate the leftISTS!) :celebrate

Left hand raised in support of those statements! :lol:

 

[Bikenut]

imported post

hopnpop wrote:

Bikenut wrote:

Odd how lefty's always demonize, demean, diminish, ridicule, or hide, any truth that does not further their agenda.

Hey now, I'm left-handed and I resent that remark!! :cuss: Don't hate the lefties!!! (hate the leftISTS!) :celebrate

My apologies to all those who are left handed.

I'm ambidextrous... even somewhat quadridexterous.. so... what does that make me?

 

[PDinDetroit]

imported post

Bikenut wrote:

hopnpop wrote:

Bikenut wrote:

Odd how lefty's always demonize, demean, diminish, ridicule, or hide, any truth that does not further their agenda.

Hey now, I'm left-handed and I resent that remark!! :cuss: Don't hate the lefties!!! (hate the leftISTS!) :celebrate

My apologies to all those who are left handed.

I'm ambidextrous... even somewhat quadridexterous.. so... what does that make me?

Mixed-up, just like the rest of us!

 

[Venator]

imported post

Did anyone copy this video story? I would like Mike to post on open carry Michigan youtube channel.

 

[Tao]

imported post

For the love of god, I thought NOT MAKING LINKS HOT was common knowledge for polls.

When you click through a link to another site, that site knows where you came from. It's called the Referrer.

The site running the poll can go back to look at their results, and see that all those No votes came from some "gun nut extremist forum", and then discount or disregard those results.

To avoid that, all poll links should be copied and pasted into the address bar at the top.

 

[Venator]

imported post

Tao wrote:

For the love of god, I thought NOT MAKING LINKS HOT was common knowledge for polls.

When you click through a link to another site, that site knows where you came from. It's called the Referrer.

The site running the poll can go back to look at their results, and see that all those No votes came from some "gun nut extremist forum", and then discount or disregard those results.

To avoid that, all poll links should be copied and pasted into the address bar at the top.

Might be wise if Internet polls held any scientific validity, which they don't.

 

[Tao]

imported post

Venator wrote:

Tao wrote:

For the love of god, I thought NOT MAKING LINKS HOT was common knowledge for polls.

When you click through a link to another site, that site knows where you came from. It's called the Referrer.

The site running the poll can go back to look at their results, and see that all those No votes came from some "gun nut extremist forum", and then discount or disregard those results.

To avoid that, all poll links should be copied and pasted into the address bar at the top.

Might be wise if Internet polls held any scientific validity, which they don't.

Of course not, but since when does the general public care about crazy stuff like science, and numbers, and facts?

 

[Venator]

imported post

Tao wrote:

Venator wrote:

Tao wrote:

For the love of god, I thought NOT MAKING LINKS HOT was common knowledge for polls.

When you click through a link to another site, that site knows where you came from. It's called the Referrer.

The site running the poll can go back to look at their results, and see that all those No votes came from some "gun nut extremist forum", and then discount or disregard those results.

To avoid that, all poll links should be copied and pasted into the address bar at the top.

Might be wise if Internet polls held any scientific validity, which they don't.

Of course not, but since when does the general public care about crazy stuff like science, and numbers, and facts?

Well I'm in the general public and I care. Or am I an irregular public?

 

[Tao]

imported post

Venator wrote:

Tao wrote:

Venator wrote:

Tao wrote:

For the love of god, I thought NOT MAKING LINKS HOT was common knowledge for polls.

When you click through a link to another site, that site knows where you came from. It's called the Referrer.

The site running the poll can go back to look at their results, and see that all those No votes came from some "gun nut extremist forum", and then discount or disregard those results.

To avoid that, all poll links should be copied and pasted into the address bar at the top.

Might be wise if Internet polls held any scientific validity, which they don't.

Of course not, but since when does the general public care about crazy stuff like science, and numbers, and facts?

Well I'm in the general public and I care. Or am I an irregular public?

In this context, general public = non-shooters. Rephrased:

Of course not, but since when does the non-shooting public care about crazy stuff like science, and numbers, and facts when it comes to guns? Especially those tied to the media, where sensationalism is the MO that gets the money.