pullnshoot25
Regular Member
My brother OJ sent me this video. Fess up, who is it?!?
http://www.break.com/index/one-good-cop-2086255
http://www.break.com/index/one-good-cop-2086255
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Which one of you is "Jeremy" in Oceanslime?
- Thread starter pullnshoot25
- Start date
thebigsd
Founder's Club Member
Well, that's the best police encounter I have seen or read all week considering what's going on in Maine and Ohio. Citizen and cop both handled themselves well. Thanks for the encouragement 
Our good friend IYAOYAS posted this a while back: http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/s...ide-new-Video-from-TODAY!&highlight=oceanside
Yesterday this video was on the front page of reddit for a while, so it got a lot of exposure. There were a lot of people saying how IYAOYAS was being rude and other things, but obviously those were comments coming from people not exercising their right to bear arms in one of the most hostile states to the practice.
Yesterday this video was on the front page of reddit for a while, so it got a lot of exposure. There were a lot of people saying how IYAOYAS was being rude and other things, but obviously those were comments coming from people not exercising their right to bear arms in one of the most hostile states to the practice.
teemgreen99
Regular Member
as i recall this video has been on youtube for a while now.
pullnshoot25
Regular Member
Aaaah, gooooooood.
IYAOYAS
Regular Member
Yeap that is mine lol woke up to 200 emails after it went on reddit
pullnshoot25
Regular Member
Daaaaaaaaaaaamn! Good jerb!
pullnshoot25
Regular Member
You handled yourself well, congrats. Glad that OPD has decided to not act like total morons.
Last edited:
Decoligny
Regular Member
Officer Lyons did try to lie to Jeremy when he first asked his last name.
Jeremy responded something like "I'm not required to give you that information".
Officer Lyons replied "You don't have to give me an ID, but you do have to identify yourself."
Jeremy stuck to his response, and Officer Lyons knew he couldn't BS the info out of him.
Jeremy responded something like "I'm not required to give you that information".
Officer Lyons replied "You don't have to give me an ID, but you do have to identify yourself."
Jeremy stuck to his response, and Officer Lyons knew he couldn't BS the info out of him.
JoeSparky
Centurion
Yes, this was better than some, BUT IT WAS NOT AS GOOD AS IT COULD HAVE BEEN!
I quit watching/listening after the officer said he was going to keep the firearm for a little while while he was checking out the individual WHO WAS FOLLOWING THE LAW. If this happened in California, which I think it did, then the officer exceeded what was allowed by 12031(e) which is simply a loaded/unloaded check--- no serial number checking, to ID checking of the carrier.... Simply a 30 sec or less NON-Consensual encounter that the Calif. law ALLOWS but does not require.
BTW, I firmly believe even the simple (e) check without going any further by the officer is a violation of our constitutional rights to be free of UNREASONABLE SEARCHES OR SEIZURES of our property, persons, and papers!
I quit watching/listening after the officer said he was going to keep the firearm for a little while while he was checking out the individual WHO WAS FOLLOWING THE LAW. If this happened in California, which I think it did, then the officer exceeded what was allowed by 12031(e) which is simply a loaded/unloaded check--- no serial number checking, to ID checking of the carrier.... Simply a 30 sec or less NON-Consensual encounter that the Calif. law ALLOWS but does not require.
BTW, I firmly believe even the simple (e) check without going any further by the officer is a violation of our constitutional rights to be free of UNREASONABLE SEARCHES OR SEIZURES of our property, persons, and papers!