eye95
Well-known member
It is the intent that earns the label. The label is silly and meaningless because it focuses on the intent and not on the act.
If the act is mass murder, call it mass murder, not ethnic cleansing. That it is done for racist reasons should not make the murders any more or less objectionable. That concept is as stupid as "hate crimes." From a legal perspective, it should not matter that the crime was done out of racial hatred. It should only matter that the crime was done.
If the act is mass murder, call it mass murder, not ethnic cleansing. That it is done for racist reasons should not make the murders any more or less objectionable. That concept is as stupid as "hate crimes." From a legal perspective, it should not matter that the crime was done out of racial hatred. It should only matter that the crime was done.