For whom?
2. truly then the news article was mistaken? armed with what pray tell?
I made the clear in my post. Try reading it.
3. see news article, violent criminal thug was unarmed and his intended victim did not suffer any injury! therefore simple assault as they were playing grab [veiled profanity redacted] at the vehicle's door!!!
Fixed that for you. The deceased is not a victim. He was a violent criminal who suffered an entirely forseeable consequence for car jacking and rushing a man with a gun in a right-to-carry State.
Nor was he playing grab-[bottom] with anyone. That term implies some kind of playful, consensual, sexual activity and it is highly offensive for you to use that term to refer to a criminal assault.
Read the Utah statute I posted previously. URS 76-5-103 is quite clear that aggravated assault doesn't require that serious bodily injury actually occur, only that the assault is "
likely to produce death or serious bodily injury."
I don't have to wait to suffer serious injuries to defend myself with deadly force in Utah, and anyone with enough literacy to know how to capitalize at the start of sentences would understand that upon reading it.
And I note your use of veiled profanity in violation of forum rules.
4. sorry see previous post...this portion of the activity was not carried out therefore no crime!!.
What kind of anti-self-defense hack even suggests such a thing. He was in the very act of committing the crime. He doesn't have to gain control of the car and drive away.
Why don't you come on out to Utah and run for State Attorney General on that kind of platform so a million registered voters can laugh you to shame.
5. driver of the vehicle was unhurt according to the news article and did not require ER treatment therefore, hyperbole on life and limb threat unless you can prove otherwise.
LIKELY to cause severe injure doesn't mean that severe injury has to occur. Prove otherwise with citations.
6. again has warrants...so what...fail to pay a traffic ticket and see what is issued by the bench. and yes violent criminal thug who has now assumed room temperature...everyone else went home didn't they?
Fixed that for you again.
Keep defending the deceased criminal all you want. You're just looking foolish at this point.
once again, you are lovely when you are challenged and don't like the comments presented which goes against your OPINION which then forces you to resort to all kinds of subjective opinions thrown about about the poster, quite testy aren't you!!
I just don't suffer gross fools kindly. It is a character flaw that some are prone to expose.
BTW...PIPPER...YOU HAVE A CITE FOR THE PREVIOUSLY POSTED HYPERBOLE YOU POSTED OR ARE YOU GOING TO TROT ON YOUR NORMAL MERRY WAY...
Citations have been provided and even explained now. But the semi-literate may have problems with comprehension.
darn the caps lock does work on my keyboard...looky there...thanks for the suggestion
Good Scooby. Now, try the regular shift key on the first letter of each sentence.
Charles