That POOR LEO has been FIRED.

[Dreamer]

http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2903.21

Funny, if an officer is guilty of aggravated menacing then it's a first degree misdemeanor. If the officer is a victim, it suddenly becomes a fifth degree felony. Why the special privileges? Are officers "Above the law"? Seems to be.

The "mercenary guild" of the New World Order is afforded special privileges, powers, and dispensations, so that they may feel important, powerful and invincible. This enables many of them to put things like empathy, humanity and morals aside in pursuit of the totalitarian universal serfdom that their puppet masters wish to establish, but are cloaking as "social order".

This is a technique thousands of years old, used throughout history to develop and foster a mercenary class willing to do ANYTHING for their sociopathic puppet masters, and has been used to great effect to turn many well-intentioned men into completely amoral monsters.

Of course, such an establishment will by nature attract the naturally sociopathic, which revel in the unfettered power of others, and perceived total protection from the usual consequences of their desire to violate the humanity of others.

In the end, their masters will treat them like ALL "masters" have treated their thugs--once power is absolute, the first to go will be the "brown shirts".

Until then, we should pray for them, that they see the errors of their ways, and turn away from their dark overlords, and return to their originaly intended station by society--that of "peace officers", and not as the 21st century equivalent of "Fida’i".

Not all LEOs are bad. Not all laws that protect them are bad. But we must remember that the few that ARE bad are merely symptoms of a larger evil--they are protected by laws enacted by their fellow sociopaths higher up the heirarchy, who are but mere errand-boys for the true "invisible hands" that are slowly attempting to choke the very life from free humanity....

 

[OC for ME]

http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2903.21

Funny, if an officer is guilty of aggravated menacing then it's a first degree misdemeanor. If the officer is a victim, it suddenly becomes a fifth degree felony. Why the special privileges? Are officers "Above the law"? Seems to be.

I think you need to read this statute a little more closely.

If the victim of the offense is an officer or employee of a public children services agency or a private child placing agency and the offense relates to the officer’s or employee’s performance or anticipated performance of official responsibilities or duties, aggravated menacing is a felony of the fifth degree or,

I do not think that this statute includes LE, just those folks (officers) who work for Child protective Services or their private counterparts (adoption agency?). Likely this statute is designed to 'protect' the folks who have the job of placing kids in homes after they have been removed from their parents at the order of a judge.

Could this statute be extended to include a LEO who assists in a child's placement process? I do not know.

 

[Dreamer]

I do not think that this statute includes LE, just those folks (officers) who work for Child protective Services or their private counterparts (adoption agency?). Likely this statute is designed to 'protect' the folks who have the job of placing kids in homes after they have been removed from their parents at the order of a judge.

Could this statute be extended to include a LEO who assists in a child's placement process? I do not know.

You DO know that CPS "enforcement divisions" in most urban areas are actually run by contractors, and are NOT actually government employees, right? And you DO know that the largest holders of CPS enforcement contracts in the US are DynCorp and Halliburton, the SAME companies that ran "white slavery" operations out of Bosnia when they were "supporting" the UN and DOD missions there starting in 1999, right?

http://www.chicagotribune.com/chi-0512270176dec27,0,6797771.story


You DO know that a child in the custody of CPS has an 11 times greater likelyhood of being abused than the average child in the care of their family, right?

http://familyrightsassociation.com/bin/white_papers-articles/dorothy_never_coming_home/


The entire reason behind CPS is not to protect children. It is to give pedophiles in high government positions the ability to harvest victims under color of law, and to increase the prison population of slave labor by incarcerating parents on trumped-up charges...

 

[ThatOneChick]

I think you need to read this statute a little more closely.

I do not think that this statute includes LE, just those folks (officers) who work for Child protective Services or their private counterparts (adoption agency?). Likely this statute is designed to 'protect' the folks who have the job of placing kids in homes after they have been removed from their parents at the order of a judge.

Could this statute be extended to include a LEO who assists in a child's placement process? I do not know.

It states "officer or employee of a public children services agency or a private child placing agency"

Definition of "officer" for that section:

(11) “Law enforcement officer” means any of the following:

(a) A sheriff, deputy sheriff, constable, police officer of a township or joint police district, marshal, deputy marshal, municipal police officer, member of a police force employed by a metropolitan housing authority under division (D) of section 3735.31 of the Revised Code, or state highway patrol trooper;

(b) An officer, agent, or employee of the state or any of its agencies, instrumentalities, or political subdivisions, upon whom, by statute, a duty to conserve the peace or to enforce all or certain laws is imposed and the authority to arrest violators is conferred, within the limits of that statutory duty and authority;

(c) A mayor, in the mayor’s capacity as chief conservator of the peace within the mayor’s municipal corporation;

(d) A member of an auxiliary police force organized by county, township, or municipal law enforcement authorities, within the scope of the member’s appointment or commission;

(e) A person lawfully called pursuant to section 311.07 of the Revised Code to aid a sheriff in keeping the peace, for the purposes and during the time when the person is called;

(f) A person appointed by a mayor pursuant to section 737.01 of the Revised Code as a special patrolling officer during riot or emergency, for the purposes and during the time when the person is appointed;

(g) A member of the organized militia of this state or the armed forces of the United States, lawfully called to duty to aid civil authorities in keeping the peace or protect against domestic violence;

(h) A prosecuting attorney, assistant prosecuting attorney, secret service officer, or municipal prosecutor;

(i) A veterans’ home police officer appointed under section 5907.02 of the Revised Code;

(j) A member of a police force employed by a regional transit authority under division (Y) of section 306.35 of the Revised Code;

(k) A special police officer employed by a port authority under section 4582.04 or 4582.28 of the Revised Code;

(l) The house of representatives sergeant at arms if the house of representatives sergeant at arms has arrest authority pursuant to division (E)(1) of section 101.311 of the Revised Code and an assistant house of representatives sergeant at arms;

(m) A special police officer employed by a municipal corporation at a municipal airport, or other municipal air navigation facility, that has scheduled operations, as defined in section 119.3 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 14 C.F.R. 119.3, as amended, and that is required to be under a security program and is governed by aviation security rules of the transportation security administration of the United States department of transportation as provided in Parts 1542. and 1544. of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as amended.

http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2901.01

 

[OC for ME]

It states "officer or employee of a public children services agency or a private child placing agency"

Definition of "officer" for that section:

http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2901.01

'officer' = law enforcement officer?

(b) An officer, agent, or employee of the state or any of its agencies, instrumentalities, or political subdivisions, upon whom, by statute, a duty to conserve the peace or to enforce all or certain laws is imposed and the authority to arrest violators is conferred, within the limits of that statutory duty and authority;

In Missouri, CPS folks are not LEOs. Maybe in Ohio CPS folks are LEOs, though I could not find where it stated as such in the statutes. They could be, I just have not found the statute(s).

 

[ThatOneChick]

'officer' = law enforcement officer?

In Missouri, CPS folks are not LEOs. Maybe in Ohio CPS folks are LEOs, though I could not find where it stated as such in the statutes. They could be, I just have not found the statute(s).

ORC is quite different in navigating than I'm used to so, I only found those tidbits. Am I misunderstanding the "upon whom, by statute, a duty to conserve the peace or to enforce all or certain laws is imposed and the authority to arrest violators is conferred, within the limits of that statutory duty and authority;"? I'm taking it that there are some people with limited power such as CPS but, I'm also taking it that "an officer" could be a LEO, yes? Since the definition of a LEO could be "an officer".

Forgive my layman. I've always been confused by "Not all LE is LEOs" and all of that.

 

[OC for ME]

You could be correct with regards to Ohio. My perspective comes from the term 'officer of the court', not all officers of the court have arrest powers. I just do not know. Some public 'servants' have badges such as building inspectors, health inspectors, they are city officers, I guess, but do not have arrest powers yet have code enforcement powers. I guess the pertinent issue is the 'authority to arrest' part of the statute. May be just a word-smithing thing.

 

[Cracker]

Yes but his partner should have been fired also, he just watched and let it happen. He watched his partner manhandle and threaten to kill someone that was already restrained and just watched.

What happened to Serve and PROTECT.

I firmly believe that that has nothing to do with the citizens. It's the thin blue line they (Some, not all.) serve and protect. They have no duty to protect anyone.

 

[RCall]

When i heard about this guy getting fired i now think i know how the umpa lumpas felt when Dorthys house fell on the witch.

 

[OC for ME]

Munchkins....

 

[Tosta Dojen]

Daniel Harless to appeal firing from Canton police

The city police officer fired for a pattern of verbal abuse and making threats is trying to get his job back.

Patrolman Daniel Harless is proceeding with the arbitration process, said Kristen Bates Aylward, an assistant city law director.

In January, Safety Director Thomas Ream fired Harless.

Bates Aylward said Thursday that she and the attorney representing Harless have tentatively settled on a neutral third-party arbitrator, who will be asked to hear the case.

(more at Cantonrep.com)

 

[Glock9mmOldStyle]

Daniel Harless to appeal firing from Canton police

The city police officer fired for a pattern of verbal abuse and making threats is trying to get his job back.

Patrolman Daniel Harless is proceeding with the arbitration process, said Kristen Bates Aylward, an assistant city law director.

In January, Safety Director Thomas Ream fired Harless.

Bates Aylward said Thursday that she and the attorney representing Harless have tentatively settled on a neutral third-party arbitrator, who will be asked to hear the case.

(more at Cantonrep.com)

Mr. Harless is not fit to man the broom & dust pan that follows the Elephants at the Circus! What a A$$Hat.

 

[since9]

Arbitration is by no means a compromise. It's simply an opportunity for the ex-officer to tell his side of the story in a way he couldn't do earlier.

The department still has their standards, and if the ex-officer's behavior failed to meet them, the department can conclude the arbitration by saying, "No."

 

[DocWalker]

Arbitration is by no means a compromise. It's simply an opportunity for the ex-officer to tell his side of the story in a way he couldn't do earlier.

The department still has their standards, and if the ex-officer's behavior failed to meet them, the department can conclude the arbitration by saying, "No."

I would rather him tell his side of the story in a trial.....

Maybe for assualt and battery or I'm sure there are other laws he broke. He sure broke the pubic trust and his duty to the community (HIS BOSSES).

 

[Deanimator]

Arbitration is by no means a compromise. It's simply an opportunity for the ex-officer to tell his side of the story in a way he couldn't do earlier.

The department still has their standards, and if the ex-officer's behavior failed to meet them, the department can conclude the arbitration by saying, "No."

Harless's DOCUMENTED history clearly demonstrates that the Canon PD has NO standards, otherwise he would have been gone two dashcam videos ago.

They LIKED what Harless did. The only thing they didn't like was being embarassed by him doing it on video to the wrong person.

The rank and file of the Canton PD has shown that they stand shoulder to shoulder with that sociopath. The public needs to stand shoulder to shoulder against them.

 

[since9]

The rank and file of the Canton PD has shown that they stand shoulder to shoulder with that sociopath. The public needs to stand shoulder to shoulder against them.

If so, then what you're saying is the arbitration is a dog and pony show to cover their own backsides before they allow him back on the force.

So:
1. If they allow him back on the force, they're giving lip service to the law and snubbing their noses at the public.

2. If they can him for good, they've grown a pair and aren't siding with the wayward officer.

Either way, the outcome of the arbitration will reveal a lot.

 

[OC for ME]

Arbitration is a dog and pony show.

Harless did give his side of the story, it was on dashcam video.

Though, if you have been fired and your union still 'fights' for your reinstatement the outcome is irrelevant.

 

[Deanimator]

Arbitration is a dog and pony show.

Harless did give his side of the story, it was on dashcam video.

Though, if you have been fired and your union still 'fights' for your reinstatement the outcome is irrelevant.

Police unions are evil incarnate.

Remember, it was the Chicago Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police who went on National Public Radio in 1996 DEMANDING that convicted wife beaters be allowed to possess and carry firearms... but only if they had badges.

Police unions exist 180deg in opposition to the public interest. They're SEIU with machine guns.

 

[ManInBlack]

Interesting how their zeal for protecting the public's safety never quite seems to match their zeal for slopping out of the public's trough...