bayboy42
Regular Member
imported post
A higher-caliber argument is needed for gun control
Tamara Dietrich
February 1, 2008
T[/i]hey were mothers of dead children alongside Virginia Tech students who'd taken bullets and lived to tell the tale. They were their friends and loved ones. They were folks who simply hate guns and their cold, indiscriminate authority with a passion.
One day last week they gathered outside the Capitol in Richmond to lie down on the winter turf for a few minutes and pretend to be dead.
They did it to show solidarity for Tech students and other victims of gun violence and to urge lawmakers to finally close a loophole that allows any criminal or head case to buy a firearm from a private seller at a gun show with no background check whatsoever.
What they didn't count on was anti-gun-control counter-demonstrators showing up in force and armed to the teeth.
Jeanette Richardson of Newport News, mother of an 18-year-old shot to death in 2004 for asking a guy to turn down his radio, calls them simply the "gun guys."
"The gun guys were menacing, well-armed and ruthless," she says. "We are all still so shocked. The Tech survivors did not deserve to be treated like that. None of us did."
Also getting the treatment was Yvette Griffin of Hampton, whose only son was gunned down by robbers for the $6.50 in his pocket.
"What made it so bad was, while we were laying there, somebody calling out, 'Y'all must be the ones who weren't armed,'" Griffin recounts. "And I'm like, 'How in the world can something come out of their mouths like that?'
"If people put themselves in our place and know what we have to go through day-to-day and walk in our shoes, they might not be able to take it."
Maybe lawmakers felt their pain, I don't know. But in the end, grieving mothers playing dead didn't convince them to close the gun-show loophole. It died in committee two days later.
Jeff Knox was also in Richmond that day, but not agitating for tougher laws. Knox is a gun guy, director of operations for the Firearms Coalition, based in Manassas, which participated in the counter-rally.
Knox says he did hear a couple of overripe comments and wasn't happy about it.
"Each time," Knox says, "the gun guys spun around on him and said, 'Hey, we're not here to do that.'"
When a man nearby yelled something obnoxious, Knox says he personally set him straight.
Their 400 gun-rights people mingled closely with the 200 gun-control people not to intimidate, he says, but to make sure their pro-gun signs were picked up by media cameras.
Talk to Knox for any length of time, as I did Thursday, and you'll come away with the belief that Knox is a sensible, articulate guy who knows weapons and isn't about to take one into a clock tower.
He will defend quite sensibly his right to take a firearm everywhere else, and can recount true-life stories where guns have stopped murderous criminals — or would have if they'd only been available.
I know gun guys like Knox and I respect them. Like them, I support the right to bear arms. Where we differ is on when that right is not absolute.
I don't have room or time enough here to run through the entire gun debate. Let's just say that the law at issue last week was a no-brainer that failed through lack of political courage.
The state should not allow a private seller at a gun show to sell a firearm to a criminal or a deranged person. Where's the problem?
For that matter, lawmakers continue to have no problem allowing guns to be carried freely into the General Assembly building itself.
As one gun-rights blogger chortled online last week, when he and his many armed cohorts arrived to start lobbying lawmakers, the metal detectors started to sing out. But they were ushered in anyway.
Even in my old stomping grounds of Arizona — a bastion of gun rights — you can't pack heat inside government buildings.
Del. Lionell Spruill Sr., D-Chesapeake, tried to end that particular Virginia tradition again this year, but pulled his own bill last week when he realized it would never make it out of committee. Again.
So he submitted it as a proposed rules change, where it had to be read on the House floor five days in a row, then voted on. It didn't just die — it was pulverized 77-18.
"Why in the world would you want to have a gun on the House floor?" Spruill said to me Wednesday, clearly upset. "Sometimes you get into a heated discussion — you never know what people will do when they get into a heated discussion."
A Christopher Newport University statewide poll this month shows that Virginians of both parties overwhelmingly favor tighter gun laws — including closing the gun-show loophole.
Yet lawmakers continue to act as if tightening gun laws is volunteering for a political wood chipper.
It strikes me that gun-control advocates have been using the wrong ammunition.
Lie-ins and heartfelt speeches have their place, but don't carry the same weight in Richmond as a Glock or a Smith & Wesson openly strapped to a leg or hip.
If you're serious about gun control and want to grab the attention of lawmakers, start buying as much firepower as the law allows.
Carry your firearms anywhere and everywhere it's legal to do so. It's easy — this is Virginia.
Then visit your legislators very, very, very often and, this is important: Pack heat every single time.
Stop lying down, and let those metal detectors sing out like Megadeth — the soundtrack of Virginia gun law politics.
http://www.dailypress.com/news/columnists/dp-news_tamara_0201feb01,0,6027269.column?page=1
A higher-caliber argument is needed for gun control
Tamara Dietrich
February 1, 2008
T[/i]hey were mothers of dead children alongside Virginia Tech students who'd taken bullets and lived to tell the tale. They were their friends and loved ones. They were folks who simply hate guns and their cold, indiscriminate authority with a passion.
One day last week they gathered outside the Capitol in Richmond to lie down on the winter turf for a few minutes and pretend to be dead.
They did it to show solidarity for Tech students and other victims of gun violence and to urge lawmakers to finally close a loophole that allows any criminal or head case to buy a firearm from a private seller at a gun show with no background check whatsoever.
What they didn't count on was anti-gun-control counter-demonstrators showing up in force and armed to the teeth.
Jeanette Richardson of Newport News, mother of an 18-year-old shot to death in 2004 for asking a guy to turn down his radio, calls them simply the "gun guys."
"The gun guys were menacing, well-armed and ruthless," she says. "We are all still so shocked. The Tech survivors did not deserve to be treated like that. None of us did."
Also getting the treatment was Yvette Griffin of Hampton, whose only son was gunned down by robbers for the $6.50 in his pocket.
"What made it so bad was, while we were laying there, somebody calling out, 'Y'all must be the ones who weren't armed,'" Griffin recounts. "And I'm like, 'How in the world can something come out of their mouths like that?'
"If people put themselves in our place and know what we have to go through day-to-day and walk in our shoes, they might not be able to take it."
Maybe lawmakers felt their pain, I don't know. But in the end, grieving mothers playing dead didn't convince them to close the gun-show loophole. It died in committee two days later.
Jeff Knox was also in Richmond that day, but not agitating for tougher laws. Knox is a gun guy, director of operations for the Firearms Coalition, based in Manassas, which participated in the counter-rally.
Knox says he did hear a couple of overripe comments and wasn't happy about it.
"Each time," Knox says, "the gun guys spun around on him and said, 'Hey, we're not here to do that.'"
When a man nearby yelled something obnoxious, Knox says he personally set him straight.
Their 400 gun-rights people mingled closely with the 200 gun-control people not to intimidate, he says, but to make sure their pro-gun signs were picked up by media cameras.
Talk to Knox for any length of time, as I did Thursday, and you'll come away with the belief that Knox is a sensible, articulate guy who knows weapons and isn't about to take one into a clock tower.
He will defend quite sensibly his right to take a firearm everywhere else, and can recount true-life stories where guns have stopped murderous criminals — or would have if they'd only been available.
I know gun guys like Knox and I respect them. Like them, I support the right to bear arms. Where we differ is on when that right is not absolute.
I don't have room or time enough here to run through the entire gun debate. Let's just say that the law at issue last week was a no-brainer that failed through lack of political courage.
The state should not allow a private seller at a gun show to sell a firearm to a criminal or a deranged person. Where's the problem?
For that matter, lawmakers continue to have no problem allowing guns to be carried freely into the General Assembly building itself.
As one gun-rights blogger chortled online last week, when he and his many armed cohorts arrived to start lobbying lawmakers, the metal detectors started to sing out. But they were ushered in anyway.
Even in my old stomping grounds of Arizona — a bastion of gun rights — you can't pack heat inside government buildings.
Del. Lionell Spruill Sr., D-Chesapeake, tried to end that particular Virginia tradition again this year, but pulled his own bill last week when he realized it would never make it out of committee. Again.
So he submitted it as a proposed rules change, where it had to be read on the House floor five days in a row, then voted on. It didn't just die — it was pulverized 77-18.
"Why in the world would you want to have a gun on the House floor?" Spruill said to me Wednesday, clearly upset. "Sometimes you get into a heated discussion — you never know what people will do when they get into a heated discussion."
A Christopher Newport University statewide poll this month shows that Virginians of both parties overwhelmingly favor tighter gun laws — including closing the gun-show loophole.
Yet lawmakers continue to act as if tightening gun laws is volunteering for a political wood chipper.
It strikes me that gun-control advocates have been using the wrong ammunition.
Lie-ins and heartfelt speeches have their place, but don't carry the same weight in Richmond as a Glock or a Smith & Wesson openly strapped to a leg or hip.
If you're serious about gun control and want to grab the attention of lawmakers, start buying as much firepower as the law allows.
Carry your firearms anywhere and everywhere it's legal to do so. It's easy — this is Virginia.
Then visit your legislators very, very, very often and, this is important: Pack heat every single time.
Stop lying down, and let those metal detectors sing out like Megadeth — the soundtrack of Virginia gun law politics.
http://www.dailypress.com/news/columnists/dp-news_tamara_0201feb01,0,6027269.column?page=1