Just wanted to hear your thoughts on this article for those that get/read Shooting Times. It's in this month's issue (Feb) on page 54. I read it last night and thought his take was a bit off... but I don't have to tell anyone on here!
He talks about being in the waffle house and seeing the two guys come in and notice him as a potential 'gun guy' and so then they leave. EXACTLY, you just made my point against your own argument.
While there are places where remaining concealed 100% may be the only legal option and it's certainly an interesting topic, it just seems the article/author was implying that open carry or 'printing' concealed carry was going to get you shot in the head or something. Uh... or, just as you witnessed, you might turn some hooligans away from robbing the joint.
I looked on Shooting Times website but it's not up yet, I will keep looking, it should get posted soon.
Anyway, my thoughts. Yours?
He talks about being in the waffle house and seeing the two guys come in and notice him as a potential 'gun guy' and so then they leave. EXACTLY, you just made my point against your own argument.
While there are places where remaining concealed 100% may be the only legal option and it's certainly an interesting topic, it just seems the article/author was implying that open carry or 'printing' concealed carry was going to get you shot in the head or something. Uh... or, just as you witnessed, you might turn some hooligans away from robbing the joint.
I looked on Shooting Times website but it's not up yet, I will keep looking, it should get posted soon.
Anyway, my thoughts. Yours?