I am a working with Kitsap County parks to get their signs up to date... Was just about to post a thread on it with all the info and emails I have compiled with the parks director...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk.
Slightly off topic, but I saw this at a King County park a few weeks ago, and had to chuckle. A bit ambiguous, but I think I know what happened...
View attachment 7266
I would recommend that you seek out a Commissioner as the Parks Director works for them and this may just avoid repeating yourself later if you do not get resolve with the Parks Department.
Good luck.
Actually the ordinance was already repealed here back in 2009... There are some links below to threads from back then... I am just working with parks to change the signs that have been left alone and still say that firearms are not allowed in the parks. Seems as though they want people to keep thinking that firearms are not allowed, even though there is no teeth to the signs claim. Doesn't help that the parks director is from NJ...
http://bit.ly/t9tYp7
http://bit.ly/tclpru
Did you notice that Seattle only partly complied with the court order? Wonder if they could be held in contempt of court?
"No Firearms" is still there in this picture, only the gun slashed through in the circle has been removed.
I'm interested in writing a piece relevant to the cost associated with the hubris of Mayor FiveCent.
Can anyone point me in the right direction with regard to research on this specific case?
Any assistance is greatly appreciated.
~Whitney
Apparently the NRA won this all by themselves. SAF and CCRKBA are merely "and others".
http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Read.aspx?ID=7162
I didn't find anything in that article that was incorrect. Kind of a stretch to suggest the NRA is trying to take all the credit.
The article linked to opens with "...several area gun owners, the NRA and the Second Amendment Foundation..."
I think it's word savings on the second reference for others. When I first read it I only saw the second one, but then I saw the first one and I'm like "Oh, ok".
If anyone would be offended by the idea of NRA not sharing credit, it would be me as one of the individual gun owner plaintiffs. I'm not because they did not do that in this particular case. I guess they learned their lessons from the Katrina debacle to actually share credit, but they backslid with McDonald.
We got the win. I don't care who says what as long as they don't claim the credit 100 percent their own.