If it isn't a lifestyle and isn't a choice yet it isn't an essential/fundamental part of your being what are you left with? YOu can't have your pie (cherry
) and eat it too!
I see where you have made your mistake: you associate my opinion that there is nothing Fundamental with Innateness. Sorry for the misunderstanding. I like pie, don't you?
Again I have showed you the true meaning of the "Commerce issue" and health care is not part of it. And if even in a twisted rationalized way that fascist/socialist interpret it, how can you mandate I buy it? Should I mandate what food you buy? What lovers you choose? That your kids should be raised in ancient aboriginal theology? That you shave all your body hair? How about female circumcision would that be ok to mandate?
Yes, you have shown me one version of a True Meaning. HealthCare is a National issue; the Commerce Clause deals with National issues. I suppose the Government could mandate the food I purchase (hmm, the FDA), and the Government, the Culture of Society has in the past coerced homosexuals into choosing lovers that they were not interested in (hmm, DOMA, hmm, so-called Sodomy Laws), hmm, State sanctioned sterilization for homosexuals). What of Aboriginal theology?; is it any different than the Christian theology that is pervasive in America? Some of these things are Cultural judgements. I do not support female circumcision, and would put a bullet in the idiots head that came to my door to circumcise any female in my home; I do question my judgement of what is "right," and "wrong" as it relates to other peoples cultures.
There will be a fight there always is when a government keeps overreaching, especially with Americans no matter how brainwashed much of the population is there is enough that won't capitulate. But a fight isn't a good thing, and the process and aftermath is very unpredictable. History has shown us that most end up like French Revolution with heads rolling . I would much rather have reason prevail and people wake up to the fact that government isn't the answer and will not solve our woes.
I think you mean to state that there will always be individuals who claim the Government is overreaching. Whether that is the case or not is, well, apparently a matter of perspective. And then you harken-back to the French Revolution; please, let's stick with the past hundred.
You, and me both would rather have Reason prevail, but you can only reach a non-violent end by consensus. What is the mantra from the right, that: consensus is defeat. And it is working out so well. Welcome to The Lost Decade, The Great Stagnation.