AFCop
Regular Member
Deleted
Last edited:
Isnt there, or wasnt there, a bill protecting information of people who have CHP's? I ask because a search under civil records from the court I obtained my CHP from (Newport News) has my name and the fact a CHP was issued at this website: http://wasdmz2.courts.state.va.us/CJISWeb
Granite, they would have to know which court and my name but I dont want people to be able to piece information about be together and find out I have a CHP. Is there anything that can be done to have those types of records removed or redacted?
Go to the website, look for your Circuit Court and search your name under civil (not criminal) and there it is...
Since CHPs are issued by court order, wouldn't every court be entering them into their docket system?Yes, but as with all "normal" bills, this one does not go into effect until July 1.
This is the first I've heard of CHP records being entered into the on-line docket system. We'll have to monitor that to ensure that they scrub this information.
I personally suspect that on June 30th, or thereabouts, ALL the major and minor anti-gun media outlets in Virginia will be making one final trip to their local Clerk's office for a last copy of the CHP list.
TFred
I tried "CONCEALED" for Newport News and got the same result.I tried searching the last name of someone I know who lives in Prince William County... his CHP info came up.
Also tried the same in Fauquier County... that guys CHP info came up. For Fauquier I searched for 'APPLICATION' in the name field and it appears that the entire CHP list is displayed.
Too late, Tfred, by about two decades.After further thought, I have decided to rescind my posts. Suggest all others do the same. This information should not be out in the public arena.
TFred
To the contrary, at least two people, the OP and myself, did not know this was available until this thread came along. It is naive to believe that everyone else in the world already knows it is there. If you respect these folks privacy at all, why would you want to provide another avenue for someone to find out they have a CHP?Too late, Tfred, by about two decades.
The VA Bar Association, in conjunction with the Courts and the Virginia Department of IT began development of an on-line docket search system in the early '90s. I'm sure by now every reporter, activist, lawyer and criminal has learned how to use it.
I was involved in the early testing of this "feature", way before web browsers. Such technology just made things easier.
To the contrary, at least two people, the OP and myself, did not know this was available until this thread came along. It is naive to believe that everyone else in the world already knows it is there. If you respect these folks privacy at all, why would you want to provide another avenue for someone to find out they have a CHP?
Just because a situation is not good does not mean we should make it worse.
TFred
Getting caught by those technology time warps can cause a hell of a whiplash.To the contrary, at least two people, the OP and myself, did not know this was available until this thread came along. It is naive to believe that everyone else in the world already knows it is there. If you respect these folks privacy at all, why would you want to provide another avenue for someone to find out they have a CHP?
Just because a situation is not good does not mean we should make it worse.
TFred
They asked the question, and were specifically directed that the existing records would remain. This seems to violate the law after July 1st, but I guess that's a question for someone else to ask the Attorney General to answer.
Of whom did they ask the question?I stopped by the Clerk's office in Fredericksburg today and had a chat with the assistant clerk. (Not sure if that's his actual title, but certainly is his job.)
They are well aware of the July 1st change, but only because they have been following it on their own. They have heard nothing "official" yet from the Supreme Court. He joked that they usually get official notice the day before it has to be done...
Couple of interesting items.
1. He was aware that the CHP case information was visible in the on-line case record database. They asked the question, and were specifically directed that the existing records would remain. This seems to violate the law after July 1st, but I guess that's a question for someone else to ask the Attorney General to answer.
2. After July 1st, new CHP case records will NOT appear in the case database. The records will be treated as confidential, and not visible.
My conclusion and opinion: The ultimate answer to this problem is to take the CHP process away from the Circuit Court and transfer it to the State Police. When CHPs were "may issue" it made sense to handle it at the Circuit Court level. Now that they are "shall issue", I don't believe there are any records unique to the Circuit Court that factor into one's qualification for a CHP. Seems it would be cheaper to move it to Richmond, hire a handful of interns at $15/hour to do records searches and issue permits.
I know some don't like pushing that sort of thing "up", but I don't see that it makes much difference, all the information goes "up" anyway.
TFred
Wow....I'd say unbelievable, but no, I can completely believe it. I wonder who the heck (leading question) told them that they could just leave all the existing records in the system, available, and that doing so wouldn't violate the new law..... :cuss:
Sorry, I sort of skipped over that part. Unlike many of the other clerks in Virginia, apparently mine stays in fairly close touch with the Supreme Court of Virginia. That was who told them to leave all the pre-July 1 records in place. More detail, the impression I got from our casual conversation is that they couldn't really figure out what to do with them, since they were already there. Points again to my opinion that this should not be handled by the court, which is designed around an open record system.Of whom did they ask the question?
Sorry, I sort of skipped over that part. Unlike many of the other clerks in Virginia, apparently mine stays in fairly close touch with the Supreme Court of Virginia. That was who told them to leave all the pre-July 1 records in place. More detail, the impression I got from our casual conversation is that they couldn't really figure out what to do with them, since they were already there. Points again to my opinion that this should not be handled by the court, which is designed around an open record system.
TFred
Questions to which I do not know the answer. Our own Peter Nap seems to have the knack for exploring the Supreme Court. But he might not want to bother for another CHP issue. I doubt he's even following this thread any longer!Wow...still....I wonder who gave the Supreme Court of Virginia the legal authority to determine how the court clerks and system are to comply with the law. Isn't this the court then interpreting the law outside of their authority to examine it based on meaning, application or constitutionality which they have authority to do as part of the Judicial process? Meaning, this is administrative compliance with a law, so I wonder what gives them the supposed authority to then outside of the court to interpret the law (and determine that they can tell the court clerks what they do with their records.
Questions to which I do not know the answer. Our own Peter Nap seems to have the knack for exploring the Supreme Court. But he might not want to bother for another CHP issue. I doubt he's even following this thread any longer!
TFred