rotty
Regular Member
No judgement until all the facts are out
http://www.sacbee.com/2010/09/04/3005027/north-highlands-rexall-clerks.html
http://www.sacbee.com/2010/09/04/3005027/north-highlands-rexall-clerks.html
No judgement until all the facts are out
http://www.sacbee.com/2010/09/04/3005027/north-highlands-rexall-clerks.html
"The first time, they gave (the robber) the money and drugs," said Yelena Gurskiy, 21. "The second time, I don't know why this happened. I guess it's because someone thought they could be a hero."
the sister, yelenia, needs a swift kick to the ****...
"The second time, I don't know why this happened. I guess it's because someone thought they could be a hero."
The anti-gun sheeple crowd would prefer dead employees, shot execution style after being herded into a back room and made to kneel. When that happens they can decry how these poor souls lost their lives due to the ease of getting a gun.
These guys were in command of the store and had free reign to walk around the store. This is obvious from the video. At the point in the video, the shootout has not begun.
I also note that these guys made no effort to cover their faces.
If I were one of the employees, that is enough to make me think that they are going to kill us all to get rid of the witnesses.
Really? Is that would any of us would want store owners to think about me when I open carry in their store?
I don't think so!
I'm sorry for the sister's loss. However, if both employees had been carrying and well trained the first time around, there may never have been a second time.
...it is obvious I am referring to the bg's being in the BACK OFFICE in the video, thus having free reign over the store.
In the eyes of the CA Judicial Sytem, it doesn't matter who fired the bullet that killed Ms. Gurskiy. The robbers, if caught, WILL be charged with Felon Murder.
If the pharmacy employee was acting lawfully to defend himself and those around him, and his firearm was lawfully possessed and registerd under CA Statutes, he cannot be held criminally liable for any death that may occur while lawfully attempting to defend himself against people in the process of committing a felony.
(snip)
[/LIST]
I don't really see why judgment would need to be passed. Sounds like someone just didn't want to be a victim again and again and again.
If a place gets robbed twice, and both times the employees just bend over for the robbers. Then what do you think is going to happen? Either they're going to come back, or someone else is going to try their hand. And it's going to keep happening unless someone stands up and puts a stop to it. Sounds to me like that's what this guy did or tried to do.
It concerns me that the assumtion seems to be that the girl got killed by her co-worker... media seems to paint a picture to lead in that direction, without saying it, and thus make the pistol-packin' co-worker a bad guy, along with the real bad guys.
...likely the robbers are wounded because he was able to actuly hit them under stressful conditions, something I don't know I'd be able to do. Hit a target, when practicing, with a good rest, etc, is one thing. Hitting something moving, under these curcumstances, way to go buddy!!!