• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Peruta Denied En Banc; Shall Issue for Ninth Circuit Upheld

ccwinstructor

Centurion
Joined
Jul 11, 2008
Messages
915
Location
Yuma, Arizona, USA
Peruta is the seminal right to carry outside the home case that was decided on February of 2014. The case was decided against Sheriff Gore of San Diego County, and San Diego County. The Sheriff and the County declined to appeal to the full Ninth Circuit for an en banc hearing. The AG for California, applied to be granted the ability to intervene for the state, to ask for a en banc hearing.

Today, 12 November, 2014, the Ninth Circuit denied the motions to intervene, thus denying requests for an en banc hearing for the decision. Therefore, Peruta stands as the law of the land in the Ninth Circuit. This means that effectively, some version of "shall issue" carry law will become law in all of the Ninth Circuit.

Hawaii just lost its highly restrictive permiting "may issue" scheme that prevented nearly anyone but a few security guards from carrying arms in Hawaii (outside of government officials). It appears that the only alternative is for the Supreme Court to hear an appeal of the Ninth Circuit ruling. Who would have standing to appeal is unclear. Both Sheriff Gore and San Diego County have indicated that they will not appeal.

This is a tremendous restoration of second amendment rights for California, Hawaii, the Northern Mariana Islands, and likely, American Samoa. There may be other jurisdictions that I am missing.

Guam has already passed a "shall issue" law, and the Northern Mariana Islands and Hawaii both have lawsuits pending.

This decision also has potential significant effects for the District of Columbia, as Peruta was heavily cited in Judge Scullin's decision that invalidated the District's ban on the carry of guns outside of the home.

The decision, coming after months of delays, but immediately following a landslide national election rejecting President Obama's policies, gives grist to the mill for those who say that judges watch election results.

It is welcome balance to the passage of I-594 in Washington state, where Billionaire's money purchased an gun owners' harassment initiative disguised as a universal background check measure.


©2014 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.

There are several live links at the site.

http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2014/11/peruta-denied-en-banc-shall-issue-for.html
Link to Gun Watch
 
Top