Ajetpilot
Regular Member
imported post
A point that may have been missed, but was noted by Dave Workman in his article here http://tinyurl.com/y8dpayf is this:
Since the IRS feels that they need these weapons to protect themselves, why can't LAC possess the same? Are we and our families not worth the protection these weapons can provide?
A point that may have been missed, but was noted by Dave Workman in his article here http://tinyurl.com/y8dpayf is this:
Fitted with 14-inch barrels (that’s 4-inches shorter than the legal minimum length for a shotgun owned by a private citizen without a special license; Washington residents can't have one because it's classified as a short barreled shotgun, and they're illegal under state statute), these are what one might call “wallpaper guns.” Shoot someone with one of these, and you’re going to turn him into wallpaper.
Since the IRS feels that they need these weapons to protect themselves, why can't LAC possess the same? Are we and our families not worth the protection these weapons can provide?