Mental illness to be Used to Disarm the Population and to Subvert tv audience?

[adam3176]

I have been looking very close to what is going on now, And the same tactics they used in the past are being used now to get Military and government forced on its own people, I believe they are doing this again since it worked so good in the past. This is happening on a global scale now infact.

Looking at some of these so called "Shooters" And the way the Media tries to make them look like Crazy wing nuts to put fear into the population isn't new. But this time it seems like there is a waking up to this on a large scale, I'm not sure who is catching on in the gun forums as much as those that don't own a gun. But it seems like a select few spotted this deception over the last few years.

In the past they would pick an evil puppet that would take the fall as they herded millions like sheep like Hitler,Stalin, ect. leaving the real power structure that gives out the orders hidden and unseen to the masses on a large scale. Even during ww1 and ww2 the "awristocrats" and there Families would hide in plain site and no one seemed to notice. As they keep putting on suits and direction countries like a game of chess. its been going on for ages.

This time the human race has a chance to keep this horror from repeating since the veil is lifting on these people that have Crashed countries and arranged other countries over the last 700+ years. Are we going to let history repeat And fall for this mental illness crap again?
I know they got some people wacked out on drugs. But that was the plan to discredit the population so the masses can be ruled by government.

Please understand that they will use mental illness as a part of background checks. And to support their claims they do have shrinks in place so the state can declare you mentally ill for seeing such deception.

This was done over and over since the beginning of time. So be aware of what we are dealing with. The reason i am saying something right now is Because i do not know how much more time we have to speak freely.

Below is a Video i made in late nov of 2011. These have to do with Fema and homeland security.
I also made a video showing they were setting up these "ROLE PLAYS" or "DRILLS" ahead of time to pick the people that would respond to such shootings. These happened in mid 2011 as they planned for mall shootings and school shootings, As if they knew they were going to happen.

Lone wolf warnings and drills.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LmugK4dJWs

homeland security videos aimed at white americans.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7iVFV6g8BQ

Mall shooting Drills school shooting drills 2011
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfgZsHa-NTA

https://www.youtube.com/user/adam3176?feature=mhee

 

[tannerwaterbury]

Jeez....who let the conspiracy people out the bag? This is like the third or fourth thread that has similar subjects. This is an Open Carry thread....if it's off topic, put OT: before you make the thread title.

 

[Freedom1Man]

This belongs in either general discussion or the social lounge.

 

[tombrewster421]

Looks like Didier got us quite a few more supporters. Maybe more people see through the smoke than some think.

 

[MSG Laigaie]

I have GOT to by more tinfoil.

 

[Freedom First]

You know, a decade ago I would have been a mocker as well. Today, having spent a great deal of time digging into our revisionist history, I am finding more and more reasons to listen to folks like Didier. Suffice to say, ALL governments lie to support their own ends and the people suffer.

Would it be beyond imagining that there could be a group of people, trained from birth to play the game and win, who have managed for generations to maintain their power over the people? Um, can you say House of Windsor? Kennedy, Rockerfeller, Morgan, Warburgs, Rothschilds, etc..

Nah, that can't happen here. This is a free country. People who talk that way are crazy... Wait, wasn't that what the OP was saying I should say/think? Hmmm. Whatever, what's on the TV tonight?

 

[Geerolla]

If you don't think the mental health angle can be used against us please consider the case of Brandon Raub, who was involuntarily committed for practicing his right to free speech on Facebook.

 

[Beretta92FSLady]

If you don't think the mental health angle can be used against us please consider the case of Brandon Raub, who was involuntarily committed for practicing his right to free speech on Facebook.

I'm sure the practice of free speech isn't what landed him in a rubber room.

 

[adam3176]

I have GOT to by more tinfoil.

Here is the Problem. I seen some of your posts and you all seem to miss the point. Im on your side so why attack me? Maybe you need to do some history research in real History books.. And throw the highschool one out.
I am all for Open carry rights and making sure we dont lose those. I am for gun rights and gun ownership. Everyone is fighting for gun rights and Protesting. However i do not think you all know what you are up against!!

People beg for gun rights and then sit on the couch as they take our homes, jobs, and outsource our food.
Tell me something MSG. Will your guns Protect you From Famin? You think it wont happen here or something?
https://www.youtube.com/user/adam3176?feature=mhee

 

[Lasjayhawk]

There is an old saying: "Support mental health or I'll kill you"

 

[Gil223]

I'm sure the practice of free speech isn't what landed him in a rubber room.

Most likely it wasn't the practice of free speech, but it was both the implied and specific content in his exercise of that right that brought him to the attention of the "Authorities". If the article is accurate in it's description of the events following his... let's call it "his emotional outburst" on FB, I believe that all those involved in his detention could have handled the situation much better.

Zeal is admirable and desirable trait - "Noun: 1. Great energy or enthusiasm in pursuit of a cause or an objective: "his zeal for privatization" 2. Enthusiastic devotion to a cause, ideal, or goal and tireless diligence in its furtherance. See Synonyms at passion."
A zealot however, is filled with zeal-on-steroids, and not generally viewed in a positive light - "Noun: A person who is fanatical and uncompromising in pursuit of their religious, political, or other ideals. 1. When capitalized, a member of an ancient Jewish sect aiming at a world Jewish theocracy and resisting the Romans until ad 70." (I would argue against the claim that the goal of the Zealot was one of "establishing a world Jewish theocracy")

I don't disagree with many of the things Brandon Raub had to say, but some of them were unreadable... due to the reflected glare from his tinfoil hat. A cogent, coherent impassioned plea is easily understood, but the speaker (writer) must be careful not to cross the invisible line into the land of "Crazy Like a S**t House Rat", in order to be taken seriously. Many - if not the majority - of conspiracy theorists live on the other side of that invisible line, perhaps because they are unaware of it's existence... or perhaps because they are unaware of the reality of their own existence. Regardless, when one thinks too far "outside the box", they get labeled as "paranoid-schizophrenic" by those who are comfortable living and thinking within that box. If their view of "reality" does not correspond with the society in which they live, they become social pariahs... but, the real question is, "Objectively, are they wrong?" Sometimes they are. Perhaps more often than not, but in almost every delusion, somewhere there is a grain of truth acceptable to the majority of people. IMHO, Raub crossed over that invisible line several times, and that tends to diminish the strength of his rational concerns - which many of us do share.

Unfortunately, we live in the age of the so-called "Patriot Act" and the National Defense Authorization Act, both of which suspend many of our Constitutional rights, by empowering agents of the government to conduct warrantless search and seizures, and detain American civilians indefinitely without due process for an unlimited period of time simply upon "suspicion of ______". The second judge apparently had greater belief in the Constitution than in those aforementioned deleterious "Acts" which attempt to deprive us of our rights.

I have visited any number of conspiracy-oriented websites. Most of them make some sense, and some of them are utter nonsense. (And, yes, that is a judgment based upon my personal sense of what constitutes "reality") Wouldn't it be ironic though, to discover someday that they were right... and society-at-large was wrong? Just my thoughts on the subject. Pax...

P.S. Right after posting this I went out on my deck for a final smoke of the day. I turned on my radio and heard a woman telling some talk radio host that there are (ostensibly) 40,000 Russian troops in Colorado Springs. That's almost 10% of the population of the Springs, and it's a story that I have heard before. Wouldn't somebody in the media have taken notice of 40,000 Russian troops in one city in America? Personally, I find it impossible to believe... BUT, I could be wrong! Does anybody in this forum live in or around Colorado Springs? (I'd like to know if there is any truth to these reports, please.) The entire country should know!

 

[Gil223]

I Googled "40,000 Russian troops in Colorado Springs this morning, and the closest believable (as one believes in Santa, or the Easter Rodent) information that I could find was from the (gag) Huffington Post, May 17 2012...

Twenty-two Russian army paratroopers are in Colorado for two weeks of training with the 10th Special Forces Group at Fort Carson, a post outside Colorado Springs.
The two nations' militaries have been conducting joint exercises for years, but this is believed to be the first time Russian soldiers have trained on U.S. soil, Lt. Col. Steven Osterholzer said.

There seems to be a major disparity between the two numbers, but the truth is out there somewhere. Twenty-two Russki's could go virtually unnoticed... even twenty-two hundred might go unnoticed within a metropolitan area population of over 416,000. But, unless they were bivouacked in tents in a training area, I can't think of a single base in the U.S. that has the capacity to house 40,000 troops - even if they came from friggin' Munchkin Land. Stevie Wonder would notice that! (Nonetheless, I would still like to see some input from somebody who lives in that area) :dude: Pax...

 

[Freedom1Man]

I Googled "40,000 Russian troops in Colorado Springs this morning, and the closest believable (as one believes in Santa, or the Easter Rodent) information that I could find was from the (gag) Huffington Post, May 17 2012... There seems to be a major disparity between the two numbers, but the truth is out there somewhere. Twenty-two Russki's could go virtually unnoticed... even twenty-two hundred might go unnoticed within a metropolitan area population of over 416,000. But, unless they were bivouacked in tents in a training area, I can't think of a single base in the U.S. that has the capacity to house 40,000 troops - even if they came from friggin' Munchkin Land. Stevie Wonder would notice that! (Nonetheless, I would still like to see some input from somebody who lives in that area) :dude: Pax...

Many Russians are 'white' and if they spoke the American/English language well enough, most people might never notice.

I am not contradicting you mind you, just giving a semi-plausible explanation as to why they might go unnoticed in the numbers proposed (40,000).

 

[OC for ME]

I'm sure the practice of free speech isn't what landed him in a rubber room.

Typical liberal response. Read all of the "reference material" linked in the article. You will be exposed to information that refutes you surety. Though, you being a liberal, facts are not relevant in your efforts to further your anti-liberty agenda. Interesting read that obscure statute. A judge seems to have disagreed with the "states" contention re Mr. Raub.

 

[Beretta92FSLady]

Typical liberal response. Read all of the "reference material" linked in the article. You will be exposed to information that refutes you surety. Though, you being a liberal, facts are not relevant in your efforts to further your anti-liberty agenda. Interesting read that obscure statute. A judge seems to have disagreed with the "states" contention re Mr. Raub.

You love using the term Liberal, don't you?

Great news for Mr. Raub, then.

 

[OC for ME]

You love using the term Liberal, don't you?

Great news for Mr. Raub, then.

No, but I will not refer to a rabbid dog as well mannered just to be kind to the dog or its owner.

 

[stealthyeliminator]

Is it a coincidence that health providers are about to be required by law to make their patient records accessible via internet around the same time that we are looking at new gun legislation restricting ownership based on mental fitness?

Want to buy that handgun? Just let me run a couple of checks. Uh oh, looks like you were diagnosed as clinically depressed 3 years ago. You don't meet the requirements for gun ownership. NEXT.

May not get to that, I'll let you believe what you will. Just know that these two events are happening in close proximity to each other and the one will probably end up greatly increasing the enforceability of the other, I'd imagine.