But, should the district “provide the opportunity”, or should they just get out off the way of the RKBA?
I believe that they should get out of the way of the RKBA. The decision to get the training would then be the responsibility of the carrier—to the point of his being held responsible for any negligent use of the firearm aggravated by any choice not to be trained.
Mandatory training would be appropriate—IF a teacher carries as part of duties assigned by the school, a governmental entity.
EMPLOYER is the key word...their work place, facilities, property, their policies ~ period!
just like your EMPLOYER doesn't allow firearms in employee's vehicles on their property!
just like your EMPLOYER mandates you have a background check prior to working.
just like your EMPLOYER can fire you on the spot w/o cause.
absolutely nothing to do with constitutional mandates
oh a bit of a nit eye95, school's are not a governmental entity whatsoever!