Reasoned and reasonable discussion is not possible when one half of the participants relies upon emphatic assertion, and the other half cites statute....
Still waiting to hear from the gentleman from White Oak Plantation. I guess when the answer is not found in a definition, or the exact wording of a statute, or some internet squib that they can just repeat, a response becomes more challenging for some. Think about your response some more. I'll wait.
You have posted nine times in this thread and relied upon emphatic assertion in eight of your posts. The one post, number 27, UNITED STATES v. DOUGLASS, to support you assertions is clearly not relevant to the question in the op.
If I have missed a WI statute that states/confirms your assertion, I will be further educated, until then I can only rely upon WI statutes as guidance.