color of law
Accomplished Advocate
I'm glad you recognize your problem.meh.
I'm glad you recognize your problem.meh.
There is nothing in the forum rules that requires a person to cite other posts. Why do people try to enforce non-existent rules? It's like cops trying to enforce laws that don't exist. Here is the rule:
(5) CITE TO AUTHORITY: If you state a rule of law, it is incumbent upon you to try to cite, as best you can, to authority. Citing to authority, using links when available, is what makes OCDO so successful. An authority is a published source of law that can back your claim up - statute, ordinance, court case, newspaper article covering a legal issue, etc.
Apparently, some of us don't know the rules.
Still not reading my words correctly. Please try again.
Yes, I know that this response shows you no respect as an adult. Want it? Give it.
There is nothing in the forum rules that requires a person to cite other posts. Why do people try to enforce non-existent rules? It's like cops trying to enforce laws that don't exist. Here is the rule:
(5) CITE TO AUTHORITY: If you state a rule of law, it is incumbent upon you to try to cite, as best you can, to authority. Citing to authority, using links when available, is what makes OCDO so successful. An authority is a published source of law that can back your claim up - statute, ordinance, court case, newspaper article covering a legal issue, etc.
Apparently, some of us don't know the rules.
Still not reading my words correctly. Please try again.
Yes, I know that this response shows you no respect as an adult. Want it? Give it.
Last try.No, sir, you are still reading my words incorrectly. I wrote a few very simple sentences that say very precisely what I meant them to say. You are reading into them that which I did not say.
If you care to discuss precisely what I said like an adult, let’s. If not, I won’t show any respect to your trolling.
I actually spent about an hour drafting a reply. I posted it, then deleted it.Last try.
You alluded that you changed PD policy. And there was documentation .
You did not , got called on providing the " documentation " which does not exist and started crawdadding.
What you apparently did was simply buck up on some over zealous cops over illegal stops . Which may have lowered the incidence of those stops but surely changed nobody's mind thru discussion, winning hearts and minds etc.
Then you claimed non existent documentation using other posters posts as documentation. " well documented ".
That sir is NOT documentation. Its internet posts .
No, sir, you are still reading my words incorrectly. I wrote a few very simple sentences that say very precisely what I meant them to say. You are reading into them that which I did not say.
If you care to discuss precisely what I said like an adult, let’s. If not, I won’t show any respect to your trolling.
I actually spent about an hour drafting a reply. I posted it, then deleted it.
I still detected too much snark in your post to dignify your demand with a reply.
It is unfortunate that this is your last try. If you had tried a little respect, I would have left my reply in place.
As it stands now, you can do you know what up a rope.
You and your buddies should feel free to keep trashing this once-great site.
I actually spent about an hour drafting a reply. I posted it, then deleted it.
I still detected too much snark in your post to dignify your demand with a reply.
It is unfortunate that this is your last try. If you had tried a little respect, I would have left my reply in place.
As it stands now, you can do you know what up a rope.
You and your buddies should feel free to keep trashing this once-great site.
3?God love you, John. You have allowed these three to kill your once-great site.
God love you, John. You have allowed these three to kill your once-great site.
You are the one being trashed, not this forum. You are a sniveling little brat. Yes I violated the rules. Sometimes the rules need to be broken. Grow-up little man, grow-up.I actually spent about an hour drafting a reply. I posted it, then deleted it.
I still detected too much snark in your post to dignify your demand with a reply.
It is unfortunate that this is your last try. If you had tried a little respect, I would have left my reply in place.
As it stands now, you can do you know what up a rope.
You and your buddies should feel free to keep trashing this once-great site.
You are the one being trashed, not this forum. You are a sniveling little brat. Yes I violated the rules. Sometimes the rules need to be broken. Grow-up little man, grow-up.
John you are free to delete this at any time.
P/S I'm reporting myself.........
When truth (facts) do not sway the opposition...I feel like this discussion should have it’s own thread and not detract from the purpose of the original OP: discussing how to effectively combat lies from the opposition.
That won't work. As long as eye95 remains on this forum, every thread opened will be destroyed by him.I feel like this discussion should have it’s own thread and not detract from the purpose of the original OP: discussing how to effectively combat lies from the opposition.
I feel like this discussion should have it’s own thread and not detract from the purpose of the original OP: discussing how to effectively combat lies from the opposition.