oshane
Opt-Out Members
imported post
The "until further notice" tripe statement on the phone by the police officer does concern me. Sounds like another way of subtly trying to get you to not open carry, but it is smoke and mirrors.
No, you shouldn't worry in the long run about preempted laws. They are dead letter.
So the city attorney was wrong and publicly repudiated his previously held wrong views. Sounds like a step in the right direction.Uh, not quite...
If you read the entire thread carefully, you will find that not only was the city attorney VERY resistant to that (a preempted) interpretation of PB's laws, but also that the seeming sacrificial lamb (since when does a police dept have a low-level officer speak for it) felt the same way - the attorney only changing his tune when at the council meeting.
Even now, the best that can be gotten out of the police department is that "until further notice" one needn't worry?
"But in the meantime, you shouldn't be worried about the ones listed in this thread."
In the meantime, I and any right-thinking person SHOULD worry about preempted laws (or those that are unclear) remaining on the books.
Here's another example, though not from Wyoming, of where you'd better have the appropriate size checkbook if you're not worried about such things:
http://buckeyefirearms.org/node/6528
The "until further notice" tripe statement on the phone by the police officer does concern me. Sounds like another way of subtly trying to get you to not open carry, but it is smoke and mirrors.
No, you shouldn't worry in the long run about preempted laws. They are dead letter.