imported post
In a defensive use of a firearm the weapon will be taken as evidence. Recent news stories reported that the individual involved in the New Haven Wooster Square "incident" had his permit taken by New Haven Police.
On face value alone this does not sound like revocation of the permit, only the fact that the police took possession of the permit. Correct me if I am wrong but doesn't Connecticut law requires the permit be carried if you are carrying your weapon? So by default without physically possessing a permit one can no longer carry.
My thoughts are; if legal it would be an excellent idea to have an additional permit in a safe place for a "rainy day". That way one could legally carry if they so desired.
Thoughts?
In a defensive use of a firearm the weapon will be taken as evidence. Recent news stories reported that the individual involved in the New Haven Wooster Square "incident" had his permit taken by New Haven Police.
On face value alone this does not sound like revocation of the permit, only the fact that the police took possession of the permit. Correct me if I am wrong but doesn't Connecticut law requires the permit be carried if you are carrying your weapon? So by default without physically possessing a permit one can no longer carry.
My thoughts are; if legal it would be an excellent idea to have an additional permit in a safe place for a "rainy day". That way one could legally carry if they so desired.
Thoughts?