• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

California Firearms Laws Summary Booklet - 2006

R

red-beard

New member
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
3
Location
Houston, Texas, USA
imported post

I just sent a Letter to the Firearms Division of the AG in California.

The booket on the website does not differentiate between incorporated and unincorporated areas for open carry.

I sent in a message stating as such,named theappropriate caseand linked the appropriate case law.

I wonder if there is a penalty for producing a "summary" booklet that contains misleading information.

James
 
I

ilbob

Campaign Veteran
Joined
May 9, 2006
Messages
778
Location
, Illinois, USA
imported post

A pamphlet the ISP prepared a number of years ago was pretty good, but also contained several weasel phrases in it that made it appear the law required something that was not actually required.

I think it is very hard for a government entity to give out legal advice to citizens, especially when that same entity is the one that enforces that law.

They are going to be inclined to error on the side of caution, and not tell people it is OK to do things that they know their own officers are likely to not know the law allows some conduct.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top