Are we already at war?

[eye95]

yet another thread trainwrecked by --mod edited--

Yep. It'll post a half-a-dozen thoughtless drive-bys that make little sense and are designed only to disrupt. Once it enters a conversation, I end up skipping page after page of its bilge (and people foolishly trying to have a conversation with it) before finding something worth discussing.

What a waste of bandwidth.

 

[Gil223]

Yep. It'll post a half-a-dozen thoughtless drive-bys that make little sense and are designed only to disrupt. Once it enters a conversation, I end up skipping page after page of its bilge (and people foolishly trying to have a conversation with it) before finding something worth discussing.

What a waste of bandwidth.

+1

 

[sudden valley gunner]

I don't mean to disagree with so much of what people post, here; but: The Constitution is a contract between the Collective--including individuals who don't agree with the Constitution, but engage in the politics of it (voting)--, and the representative.

Read Lysander Spooner's No. Treason 1.

If the founders understood the constitution to mean rule of the majority, they never would have agreed to it. It simply says we the people, which would be the minorities and the majorities.

 

[Freedom1Man]

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...-licensed-civilians-with-guns/comment-page-4/

Chicago Police Chief: We’ll Shoot Licensed Civilians With Guns
Posted by Jim Hoft on Saturday, January 12, 2013, 9:37 PM

“You put more guns on the street expect more shootings,” McCarthy said. “I don’t care if they’re licensed legal firearms, people who are not highly trained… putting guns in their hands is a recipe for disaster. So I’ll train our officers that there is a concealed carry law, but when somebody turns with a firearm in their hand the officer does not have an obligation to wait to get shot to return fire and we’re going to have tragedies as a result of that. I’m telling you right up front.”



Sounds like war to me.

 

[Beretta92FSLady]

Read Lysander Spooner's No. Treason 1.

If the founders understood the constitution to mean rule of the majority, they never would have agreed to it. It simply says we the people, which would be the minorities and the majorities.

I agree: compromise ought to be part of all dialogue between the People's representatives.

 

[Freedom1Man]

http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=23909

What if I told you police in your town could desensitize themselves to the idea of shooting a (armed) child, pregnant woman, or young mother, for just a couple of bucks? The "No More Hesitation" series from Law Enforcement Targets Inc. offers exactly that. For less than 99 cents per target, police can shoot at real-life images "designed to give officers the experience of dealing with deadly force shooting scenarios with subjects that are not the norm during training."

 

[eye95]

There is already a thread on that subject. Do you really need to hijack an unrelated thread also???

 

[Freedom1Man]

There is already a thread on that subject. Do you really need to hijack an unrelated thread also???

Not changing the subject at all.

Just adding evidence to support my belief that, yes, we are already at war. "We" just have not taken the field yet and we are still being killed in our homes.

 

[sudden valley gunner]

I agree: compromise ought to be part of all dialogue between the People's representatives.

We don't agree, I don't believe in chattel or political slavery.

Saying a majority has the authority to set rights means the minority only has the rights the majority says they can. Which means they are not rights at all, but since I believe no one tells me what my fellow human beings and rights are and that they are fundamental, we don't agree.

 

[Beretta92FSLady]

We don't agree, I don't believe in chattel or political slavery.

Saying a majority has the authority to set rights means the minority only has the rights the majority says they can. Which means they are not rights at all, but since I believe no one tells me what my fellow human beings and rights are and that they are fundamental, we don't agree.

Hold up...I agree there are Fundamental Rights.

 

[sudden valley gunner]

Hold up...I agree there are Fundamental Rights.

Yay! That is a change of position from the past.

 

[Beretta92FSLady]

Yay! That is a change of position from the past.

Nah. I have always believed there are Fundamental Rights. Unfortunately, that's not what we're talking about, most the time.