imported post
I thought I had answered this from my mobile, but I guess it got lost in cyberspace somewhere....so here goes with round two.
There are several reasons I doubt the shooter will be charged/convicted.
1. The person who was shot was known to the sheriff's department, and not in a good way. For what lawful purpose was this man at another man's home during darkness? What lawful reason could he have for being where he was? His presence there, under the circumstances, is an indication that he had evil intent.
2. The person shooting was on his property, when someone, at night, during the hours of darkness, shines a light on his face. What reasonable person (defined as a person of the same education, training and experience) would think that this is an innocent act?
3. This occurred in Lewis County, not Clark or King County. The jury pool would be made of his peers (my neighbors)... While some persons here live in rather more metropolitan areas, it's still rather rural in both geography and mindset. We have more of a "take care of ourselves" feeling out here.
As I said, I doubt this will ever get to charges, or if it does for political reasons, I doubt a conviction will come of this....