With respect of the rule, and for further conversation, answer this.
This video is a perfect example of what I am talking about. People who, by all appearances, are doing nothing illegal. And a police officer, who apparently has some mental issues, decides he doesnt like what they are doing, and demands ID. When they dont show it, which is legal, he decides to assault and threaten bodily harm to them. Now, here is the question. In the above described situation, what, I ask you, would be illegal about physical resistance? Do you believe a badge gives an officer to, on a whim, assault someone? Do you believe that when an officer breaks the law that he becomes a criminal?
The LE community has used the court system to their favor when things like this happen. Why do you think there are so many videos of officers violating peoples rights by stealing cameras and making unlawful arrests? Because with cameras around they have lost their best weapon for defense of their illegal actions. Their word v ours.
That is why I support LEGAL physical resistance.
Indeed this is becoming wearisome. The rule is there for a reason - the admonition was in order. The question(s) posed are outside the parameters of this thread.
If you wish to pursue this avenue, I suggest a new thread but tread carefully as you will likely run into the same limitations otherwise.
There are other choices beside physical resistance, whether legal or illegal. ymmv