• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

308 or 223?

MAC702

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2011
Messages
6,331
Location
Nevada
With a bit more power and higher priced brass and then if you need a bit faster Nothing wrong with the swift but the 22-250 kills very will and is a bit cheaper to use.

Dosen't much matter to the low volume shooter but thousands of rounds on a P dog trip several times a year the costs add up.

But then the 223 is the most cost effective.

Do you still have the orginal barrel on your swift.

Yeah, not much prairie dog shooting out here! My rifle doesn't see many rounds.

It's still the original barrel, but was made in the 70s in the modern era of good chrome-molybdenum. It doesn't suffer from the early reputation that killed the early Swifts right before the .22-250 came out to take over.

I've nothing against the .22-250, and can admit it can do the same job. It's more cool factor to have the older cartridge that can still claim the slight insignificant edge, though.

It's a slow twist and prefers the lighter bullets, but will still spin 52-grainers into a dime at 125 yards.
 
Top