Shotgun
Wisconsin Carry, Inc.
I tuned in to the web broadcast of Madison's Transit and Parking Commission meeting today. It is pretty clear that the city plans to post every Madison Metro bus shelter and transfer point. They claim that "building" is not defined in Act 35 so they interpret this to mean "any structure." Their plan includes charging anyone with a firearm inside one of these "buildings" with trespassing. One member of the commission asked how, if bus shelters were specifically identified as non-buildings when the smoking ban was passed, the could now be considered "buildings."
What purpose could this action take other than to harass gun carriers? Will those people in the shelter be more safe simply because the armed person has to stand outside of the shelter to wait for the bus?
What purpose could this action take other than to harass gun carriers? Will those people in the shelter be more safe simply because the armed person has to stand outside of the shelter to wait for the bus?