color of law
Accomplished Advocate
Apparently his namesake has no influence."THE WAR ON THE 2A IS OVER NOW THAT TRUMP IS PRESIDENT"
LOL
Apparently his namesake has no influence."THE WAR ON THE 2A IS OVER NOW THAT TRUMP IS PRESIDENT"
LOL
so is this discrimination against a disability?IIRC, when bumpstocks first came out, they said it was meant as an assist for shooters with certain disabilities. When others found what they could do with them when they weren't disabled, that's when the "fun" began.
The posting is not about bump stock use on LGs per se. It's about government overreach. Lets stay on topic.
This is USE of bumpstock is relevant to handguns right, otherwise, if memory serves LG discussion is a rule violation.
The posting is not about bump stock use on LGs per se. It's about government overreach. Lets stay on topic.
Here's a thought: How about you get and keep your errant nose out of other people's business.
snipp....
Seriously, dude. Only a moron would imply my comment was somehow "off-topic."
color of law, I do not personally care one bit about your opinion of me. You continued, and unwarranted aggression, however, makes you look bad, and by association, makes the forum look bad. That's something I do care about.
Apparently you have a reading comprehension disability. And, speciously you also don't seem to understand that I am the author of this thread, not you. Your idea that you get to dictate what my intentions are as to my original posting is quite presumptuous.Here's a thought: How about you get and keep your errant nose out of other people's business.color of law said: The posting is not about bump stock use on LGs per se. It's about government overreach. Lets stay on topic.
It was on topic. To review, here's the post you said was off topic: "Yeah, that was dumb. Plenty of videos out there on how to bump fire your semi-auto rifle merely by holding your hands and trigger finger in a certain, rigid position."
Here's WHY it's smack on topic:
Thread Title: Trump Administration Imposes Ban on Bump Stocks
OP: Two links and an excerpt, which included the fact the NRA “believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
My comment was that one's own hand and fingers allow for bump-stock-like action when held in the proper position.
Implication: Are they going to ban our hands and fingers, too? If not, then what's the point of banning bump stocks?
Seriously, dude. Only a moron would imply my comment was somehow "off-topic."
color of law, I do not personally care one bit about your opinion of me. You continued, and unwarranted aggression, however, makes you look bad, and by association, makes the forum look bad. That's something I do care about.