Or in other words, he wants documentation that they ruled Not Guilty for the reason you are claiming. A simple "NG" notation doesn't supply the rationale for the verdict.
It is quite apparent that you guys have little or no experience as to how municipal courts operate in Ohio.
Judges do not put their opinion as to why they ruled the way they did in writing. All that appears in the Journal is their decision, guilty or not guilty. If you what the judge's explanation you would have to buy the transcript. This is usually only done when one of the parties appeals. And even then the judge may not have gave an explanation as to why s/he ruled the why they did.
This case is not hard to understand.
Complaint: Gave name refused to give address
and date of birth.
Judges ruling: Not guilty.
Logical inference: “Or” means “or” not “and.” Defendant complied with the plain meaning of the statute.
The state did not appeal.
The unconstitutional statute lives another day to screw another uninformed citizen.
Moving on.