Ezerharden
Regular Member
You guys remind me of the old "pong" game ...blip...take that! Oh yeah take that BLIP!
View attachment 10132
Happy we are providing you with amusement.
Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk 2 please pardon any typo's.
You guys remind me of the old "pong" game ...blip...take that! Oh yeah take that BLIP!
View attachment 10132
Happy we are providing you with amusement.
Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk 2 please pardon any typo's.
Just trying to make light out of a "dark" situation. Remember if we're all in the same boat and we shoot holes in the bottom of that boat, we all end up at the bottom together...
Debate is par for the course, but you guys take it to a whole new level.
FreeInAZ, I was pointing out that I have an issue with unnamed sources because of the lack of credibility unnamed has had in the past, was not a slap to Phil or EZ his lap dog.
And here we go again...hope you guys have a endless supply of duct tape for the bottom of the boat...
ETA - since challenging another to a duel is no longer a crime in MI. I suggest we find seconds for each of you, and you set a duel time and date. What say you to "socker boppers" at one pace on the count of ten? I will drop ship the boppers right to your doors!
Always think when I hear inside source what it means is someone who shouldn't be saying anything or doesn't have the guts to put their name to it.
Now, there's the pot calling the kettle black. Remember this gem from 01/16/2013?
'Actually I do, can I pass it on here, not really. I suspect Phil would be able to add some light to this however.'
Be careful, my friend, when accusing people for doing the same thing you have done.....
You never did reveal your 'secret, inside, deep throat' source.....
Email from Senator Green, waited to make sure he was cool with me quoting him. In the future I will have no problems doing it however.
again I am not blaming Phil, I am blaming the person who is telling him this and doesn't want to put his name on it.
Email from Senator Green, waited to make sure he was cool with me quoting him. In the future I will have no problems doing it however.
again I am not blaming Phil, I am blaming the person who is telling him this and doesn't want to put his name on it.
So, it's OK for you, but not anyone else? Trust me, if you broadcast information provided in confidence, you will get cut off from your sources, and gain a even worse reputation.
So, it's OK for you, but not anyone else? Trust me, if you broadcast information provided in confidence, you will get cut off from your sources, and gain a even worse reputation.
" and gain a (sic) even worse reputation"?
Nice! /sarcasm off
Mind you, I like the guy, BUT- when we say we won't discuss a subject, or divulge a source, no means no. Stop asking, and quit criticizing when we refuse to betray a confidence.
Our reputations are worth far more than someone's curiosity.
If someone dislikes me for respecting peoples' confidentiality, well, I can live with that. We will not gossip or tell tales that are not ours to tell or reveal confidential sources.
I'll believe this source over a liberal media goon that half of the people here said wasn't trustable -- even before I said a word.
Mind you, I like the guy, BUT- when we say we won't discuss a subject, or divulge a source, no means no. Stop asking, and quit criticizing when we refuse to betray a confidence.
Our reputations are worth far more than someone's curiosity.
If someone dislikes me for respecting peoples' confidentiality, well, I can live with that. We will not gossip or tell tales that are not ours to tell or reveal confidential sources.