How about this?
Do you have the "Right To Remain Silent"?
The Supreme Court's 2003 decision in Chavez vs.Martinez, in which a majority of the justices held that there was no violation of the "right to remain silent" when police officers employed brutal interrogation techniques against an individual, so long as the government did not use the information extracted from the individual in any criminal trial in which he was the accused.
Put differently, the Court held that the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent is violated only when the information is used against the individual in a criminal case.
Does this sound a bit like the Gitmo waterboarding? Damned right it does.