Repeater
Regular Member
Another quote from that link:
"If Cantor truly cared about serving all the people in his district, if he truly cared to unite the party, he would send Allen packing. That he doesn’t tells you all you need to know."
Well, by now it is painfully obvious what Cantor's priorities really are.
Here is another example, courtesy Breitbart:
Complete Cantor Turnaround: No Amnesty in NDAA
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor changed direction entirely Friday, saying through a spokesman that he doesn’t plan to allow any amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that would grant amnesty to illegal aliens through the ENLIST Act.
“No proposed ENLIST amendments to NDAA will be made in order,” Cantor spokesman Doug Heye said in an email to Breitbart News.
The statement represents a complete turnaround for Cantor, who just a couple weeks ago was the leading and most powerful force behind the effort to insert a version of Rep. Jeff Denham’s ENLIST Act into the NDAA bill. Denham’s ENLIST Act, or a bill similar to it from Rep. Mike Coffman, would grant illegal alien DREAMers amnesty if they enlist in the U.S. military.
Cantor’s top political consultant Ray Allen had confirmed he was supportive of the effort in an interview with Breitbart News in mid-April, after Cantor’s primary challenger Dave Brat criticized him over it.
"Mr. Cantor views military service as the highest service one can perform for our nation, and if a young man or woman was brought to this country as a child and knows no other home and wants to serve our nation in uniform, he supports making that possible,” Allen said.
So, he was for it before he was against it. This is typical of Cantor, and for Allen who is left to explain things.
But it's really very easy: Cantor is for AMNESTY for illegal immigrants, but not right now; not until he wins(?) his June 10th Primary.
So, why should we, or anyone else, trust him on defending the RKBA or any other contentious issue?