Senate to Vote Next Week on Concealed Carry Reciprocity and other Gun Amendments

[sudden valley gunner]

Charles- I just would rather the federal government keep their heads out of it, and have all the states do exactly what I'm quoting individually.

I'm picking my favorite scenario. The current one isn't as favorable to me. shall issue has spread to most states since florida. This has also happened with gay rights. Why can't constitutional carry?


I'm not necessarily against the vote- I just see options I may like more.

The smaller the state the better to deal with. When the empire grants a right it can infringe upon that right.

I don't know about this one but the last one required ID, sneaky sneaky, the FEDS have been trying to get national ID in for a long time.

 

[skidmark]

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Now that's not nice! I hear Since9 is a decent fellow.

stay safe.

 

[77zach]

This law seems like a small win at the expense of a big, drawn out win.

I'd rather see states one by one go to constitutional carry rather than have more federal control on the books.

Recent developments in constitutional carry, with Kansas set to become No. 7 any day, are remarkable. When was the last time government relinquished control of anything? Kansas very recently went "No issue" to "shall issue" to "No license required". Shall issue was probably a necessary first step to the right being fully restored. So, I don't see the problem with the Feds saying you have to recognize licenses, as long as they don't get involved in rule making with the issuance of those licenses and where they allow someone to carry. No small concern, I admit.

 

[77zach]

http://www.gunowners.org/news03272015.htm

 

[since9]

Guessing is the easy part, but it is safe to say it had nothing to do with Concealed Carry Reciprocity and other Gun Amendments

Incorrectomundo, Grapeshot!

The response itself, regardless of the content, had everything to do with the forum, based on the comment to which I responded.

Always consider the context.

 

[since9]

What makes you think it was directed at the young fellow?

You mean, aside from Grape's comment?

FYI, I'm over 50.