• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Recall Walker

GLOCK21GB

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2009
Messages
4,347
Location
Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
How's this for jumping the gun... If he does not sign the Constitutional Carry bill, he will never get my vote nor the vote of thousands of others next election. He will be done. I am through with politicians who speak with forked tongue. His words have power and so do mine and I will use them to spread the word far and wide. No Constitutional Carry, no vote. Period.

This

PERMITS & TRAINING DOES NOT SOUND ANYTHING LIKE FREEDOM TO ME !
 
Last edited:

wild boar

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
445
Location
wisconsin
On the way!

If my promise was to get you all the way from point A, to point B, and along the way something broke down just out of site of point B. How many of you would turn around a return to point A to find another ride.
 

bigdaddy1

Regular Member
Joined
May 7, 2009
Messages
1,320
Location
Southsider der hey
Walker better get on board and not risk loosing literally thousands of voters. Its going to be a rough year as it is, loosing a large part of his supporters will not make it any easier.
 

Outdoorsman1

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2011
Messages
1,248
Location
Silver Lake WI
Walker better get on board and not risk loosing literally thousands of voters. Its going to be a rough year as it is, loosing a large part of his supporters will not make it any easier.

Agreed.. when (not if) the the time comes, he will NEED our support to fend off the recall...

Outdoorsman1
 
Last edited:

Jesse

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
67
Location
Cameron, WI
Bottom line, you either like the direction the state is going presently or you don't... nobody is perfect, nothing is certain and everyone has (and is entitled to) an opinion.

I personally like the direction things are going overall here in WI, its been a long time since I have thought this way.. Anyone that is recall happy better be ready to deal with Doyle all over again..

The question everyone needs to ask themselves is "Is the juice worth the squeeze?"
 

SkunkHunter

New member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
5
Location
, ,
Recall = Another Liberal Democrat Governor

Do you understand how the recall process works? It's basically just a new election. The Dems will nominate a candidate to run against Walker and we'll all get to vote for one or the other. You know the type of candidates the Dems typically nominate, so you can expect more of the same. There is zero chance I'll vote for any Democrat over Walker, no matter what he does between now and the recall election.
 
Last edited:

bigdaddy1

Regular Member
Joined
May 7, 2009
Messages
1,320
Location
Southsider der hey
Do you understand how the recall process works? It's basically just a new election. The Dems will nominate a candidate to run against Walker and we'll all get to vote for one or the other. You know the type of candidates the Dems typically nominate, so you can expect more of the same. There is zero chance I'll vote for any Democrat over Walker, no matter what he does between now and the recall election.

Yes I know how the system works, and no I would not be looking to award a Democratic candidate the office of Governor. You also assume that there will be no other Republican (or Tea-party, Independent or other party) running for that position. However I am also unwilling to allow someone to remain in office that openly and willingly deceived his constituents in order to get into that office. It is time we make our elected officials realize that we WILL be holding them accountable for their promises and actions. They represent us, as our voice. We did not elect them to be our conscience.

It is highly likely that there will be a recall campaign against Walker, without our support his days in office will be very limited.
 
Last edited:

Jesse

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
67
Location
Cameron, WI
Yes I know how the system works, and no I would not be looking to award a Democratic candidate the office of Governor. You also assume that there will be no other Republican (or Tea-party, Independent or other party) running for that position. However I am also unwilling to allow someone to remain in office that openly and willingly deceived his constituents in order to get into that office. It is time we make our elected officials realize that we WILL be holding them accountable for their promises and actions. They represent us, as our voice. We did not elect them to be our conscience.

It is highly likely that there will be a recall campaign against Walker, without our support his days in office will be very limited.

innocent until proven guilty... remember that.

I could get all riled up and spout off all day long about what I would do to my neighbor should he decide to steal my car..
 

bigdaddy1

Regular Member
Joined
May 7, 2009
Messages
1,320
Location
Southsider der hey
innocent until proven guilty... remember that.

I could get all riled up and spout off all day long about what I would do to my neighbor should he decide to steal my car..

I didn't put the t-shirt on yet. I am only discussing MY opinion and my INTENTIONS should Walker choose to disregard our rights he stated he would support during his election campaign. If your neighbor tells you he is going to steel your car, it would be wise to advise him not to do so and the consequences of his actions should he disregard your advise.
 

apjonas

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2006
Messages
1,157
Location
, ,
Remember

If you lied about it, yes.

A change of mind is not a lie. It may be honorable. It may be dishonorable. Or somewhere in between.
An inability to deliver due to impossibility is not a lie. It is unfortunate.
An inability to deliver due to incompetence is not a lie. It is incompetence.
Delivering something other than what you thought would
be delivered because of different conceptions of the product is not a lie. It is a mistake.
Unknowingly stating something that is false is not a lie. It is an error.
 

bigdaddy1

Regular Member
Joined
May 7, 2009
Messages
1,320
Location
Southsider der hey
A change of mind is not a lie. It may be honorable. It may be dishonorable. Or somewhere in between.
An inability to deliver due to impossibility is not a lie. It is unfortunate.
An inability to deliver due to incompetence is not a lie. It is incompetence.
Delivering something other than what you thought would
be delivered because of different conceptions of the product is not a lie. It is a mistake.
Unknowingly stating something that is false is not a lie. It is an error.

Politico talk, say it how you choose to spin it. A lie is still a lie no matter who you think you've fooled. As I said before, I aint put on the t-shirt yet, if Walker turns and these closed door talks with the MINORITY leaders turns out to be what some feel it may end up we will know how it happened.
 
Last edited:

Nutczak

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Messages
2,165
Location
The Northwoods, lakeland area, Wisconsin, USA
A change of mind is not a lie. It may be honorable. It may be dishonorable. Or somewhere in between.
An inability to deliver due to impossibility is not a lie. It is unfortunate.
An inability to deliver due to incompetence is not a lie. It is incompetence.
Delivering something other than what you thought would
be delivered because of different conceptions of the product is not a lie. It is a mistake.
Unknowingly stating something that is false is not a lie. It is an error.

Walker got elected by a majority due to the republican party platform, Now Walker has indicated that he is going against the very platform that got him into office. It no longer matters if he lied before election day, or decided to go against the platform after he was inaugurated because he is still going against the very issues that got him into office!
 

AaronS

Regular Member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
1,497
Location
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
Walker got elected by a majority due to the republican party platform, Now Walker has indicated that he is going against the very platform that got him into office. It no longer matters if he lied before election day, or decided to go against the platform after he was inaugurated because he is still going against the very issues that got him into office!

Yep, well put.

He did tell us what he would do, a few months ago...
I don't understand the new change of heart at all...
Guess it might have been just for my vote after all...
I have to wait and see, I can only hope I have this all wrong, again...

So with this all, what is the Republican party going to do about it?

As far as I understand it, Alberta Darling is at the same (old) game. "Anti-rights".
If this "party" wants my support, the members will have to start following the party position.
 
Last edited:
Top